Flexible Working Arrangements and Their Impact on Employee Engagement and Productivity

Authors

  • Kukuh Azandi Wilasto Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta Author
  • Dwi Utami Puterisari Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/34h5gw84

Keywords:

Work Flexibility, Employee Engagement, Employee Productivity

Abstract

Changes in the work landscape due to technological developments and modern organizational dynamics have encouraged the adoption of Flexible Working Arrangements as a human resource management strategy. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Flexible Working Arrangements and their impact on employee engagement and productivity. A qualitative approach with a case study design was used to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences, perceptions, and meanings constructed by employees and management. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, non-participatory observation, and documentation studies in organizations that have implemented flexible work practices on an ongoing basis. Data analysis was conducted thematically to identify patterns and relationships between phenomena. The results indicate that Flexible Working Arrangements encourage a paradigm shift from attendance-based supervision to results-based performance assessment. Work flexibility contributes positively to employee engagement by increasing autonomy, trust, and psychological well-being, although engagement levels are not uniform across all employees. Employee productivity tends to increase, particularly in jobs that require independence, time efficiency, and individual focus, while coordination challenges remain in teamwork. These findings confirm that Flexible Working Arrangements function optimally when integrated with adaptive leadership, a clear evaluation system, and consistent organizational support. This study provides theoretical and practical contributions to the development of sustainable flexible work policies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68.

Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, structure, processes (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well‐being. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38.

Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Flexible Working Arrangements and Their Impact on Employee Engagement and Productivity. (2026). Maneggio, 3(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.62872/34h5gw84

Similar Articles

11-20 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.