Screenshots, Chats, and Voice Notes: Rethinking Evidence in Criminal Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/0hb7ee97Keywords:
criminal evidence, digital evidence, screenshots, fair trial, due process of lawAbstract
The increasing reliance on screenshots, chats, and voice notes in Indonesian criminal proceedings reflects a significant shift in evidentiary practices driven by digital communication technologies. However, this development has not been followed by adequate normative adaptation within criminal procedural law. Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not explicitly accommodate micro-digital evidence, while the Electronic Information and Transactions Law merely provides general recognition without specifying procedural standards for authentication and evidentiary weight. This condition creates normative ambiguity regarding the legal status, admissibility, and probative value of screenshots, chats, and voice notes, resulting in inconsistent judicial practices and potential violations of fair trial principles. This study employs normative legal research using statute, conceptual, and case approaches to analyze the position of micro-digital evidence in Indonesian criminal trials. The findings demonstrate that unverified digital evidence risks eroding the presumption of innocence, shifting the burden of proof to defendants, and undermining legal certainty. This article argues that criminal procedural law must be reformed to explicitly regulate the classification, authentication, and corroboration of micro-digital evidence in order to ensure technological adaptation without compromising due process of law and fair trial guarantees.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, H., Maqsood, M., & Nadeem, A. (2025). Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Legal Standards, Chain of Custody, and Evidentiary Reliability in The Digital Era. Research Journal for Social Affairs. https://doi.org/10.71317/rjsa.003.05.0375.
Abuova, A., Bakirova, N., Begaliyev, Y., Begaliyev, B., & Malakhov, D. (2025). Prosecutorial Effectiveness in Kazakhstan’s Criminal Justice: The Role of Digital Forensics and Online Trial Broadcasting. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg. https://doi.org/10.61586/fg5be.
Abuova, A., Bakirova, N., Begaliyev, Y., Begaliyev, B., & Malakhov, D. (2025). Prosecutorial Effectiveness in Kazakhstan’s Criminal Justice: The Role of Digital Forensics and Online Trial Broadcasting. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg. https://doi.org/10.61586/fg5be
Al-Billeh, T., Al-Hammouri, A., Khashashneh, T., Makhmari, M., & Kalbani, H. (2024). Digital Evidence in Human Rights Violations and International Criminal Justice. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i3.446
Angel, O., Mercedes, C., Elisa, Q., Joaquin, D., De Oliveira Diaz Deny Giovanna, C., & Beatriz, G. (2023). DIGITAL EVIDENCE AS A MEANS OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Russian Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i5s.895.
Hoxhaj, A. (2025). The CJEU Ruled that the EncroChat Data can be Admissible Evidence in the EU. European Journal of Risk Regulation. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.10047.
Lishchak, A. (2025). Problems and challenges in the collection of evidence in misdemeanor cases: key issues faced by investigators and prosecutors during evidence gathering. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.05.3.31.
Luhina, N., & Paliukh, O. (2025). PECULIARITIES OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS RELATED TO CYBERCRIME. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues. https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.4.27.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Matis, J. (2025). Digital evidence and its use for criminal proceedings. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.03.3.19.
Matis, J. (2025). Digital evidence and its use for criminal proceedings. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.03.3.19.
Milimko, L., & Zhydovtsev, Y. (2025). Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings of Ukraine. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.3.45.
Miller, C. (2022). A survey of prosecutors and investigators using digital evidence: A starting point. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100296.
Petryk, V. (2025). The use of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: issues of collection, verification, and evaluation. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.87.4.17.
Stoykova, R. (2021). Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Comput. Law Secur. Rev., 42, 105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575.
Stoykova, R. (2021). Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Comput. Law Secur. Rev., 42, 105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575
Sujatmiko, B., & Soesatyo, B. (2025). The Urgency of Using Electronic Evidence in Trials as an Effort to Answer the Challenges of Law Enforcement in the Digital Era and Social Media Dynamics. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i9.567.
Sujatmiko, B., & Soesatyo, B. (2025). The Urgency of Using Electronic Evidence in Trials as an Effort to Answer the Challenges of Law Enforcement in the Digital Era and Social Media Dynamics. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i9.567.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pramidazzura Alifa Rifqi, Samsidar, Harly Clifford Jonas Salmon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
