Analysis of the Proof of Gratuity as a Criminal Act of Corruption in Criminal Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/z4akxw44Keywords:
Gratification, Criminal Justice, Corruption CrimesAbstract
This article examines the construction of proof of gratification as a form of corruption crime within the Indonesian criminal law system, particularly concerning the application of reverse proof as regulated in Law No. 31 of 1999 jo. Law No. 20 of 2001. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and jurisprudence review. The analysis results show that proof of gratification contains a juridical dilemma between the effectiveness of eradicating corruption and the protection of the presumption of innocence principle. Article 12B creates a shift in the burden of proof, which is normatively recognized by the Constitutional Court, but its implementation still raises issues of legal uncertainty and inconsistency in interpreting the elements of positional relationship and the intention of acceptance. The mechanism for reporting gratuities through the KPK essentially provides legal protection, but its effectiveness depends on the compliance of public officials and the capacity for oversight. This study emphasizes the need to strengthen regulations, harmonize jurisprudence, and provide technical guidelines for evidence to ensure a balance between the effectiveness of law enforcement and the protection of defendants' constitutional rights.
Downloads
References
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Angraeni, N., Bunga, D., Citranu, C., & Aris, A. (2024). Hukum pidana: Teori komprehensif. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Ismail, N. V., Wantu, F. M., & Tome, A. H. (2025). Ambivalensi Putusan Hakim: Tantangan dalam Upaya Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum Pilkades di Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2920–2933.
Nasution, R. P. (2021). Diktat Hukum Pidana.
Puanandini, D. A., Maharani, V. S., & Anasela, P. (2025). Korupsi sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa: Analisis Dampak dan Upaya Penegakan Hukum. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum, 4(1).
Raihan, M. (2023). Perlindungan Data Diri Konsumen Dan Tanggungjawab Marketplace Terhadap Data Diri Konsumen (Studi Kasus: Kebocoran Data 91 Juta Akun Tokopedia). Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(10), 7847–7856.
Rudyanto, E., Subekti, S., Suyono, Y. U., & Widodo, E. (2025). Analisis Sanksi Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Kartu Kredit. Media Bina Ilmiah, 19(9), 5661–5668.
Shodiq, M. (2025). Hukum Pidana Perbandingan. Takaza Innovatix Labs.
Suriyo, S., Astutik, S., Subekti, S., & Widodo, E. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Peredaran Rokok Tanpa Pita Cukai. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5(2), 1241–1246.
Suryanto, A. F. B. (2021). Penegakan hukum dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi suap menyuap dan gratifikasi di Indonesia. " Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(2), 4.
Suyono, Y. U., & Firdiyanto, D. (2020). Mediasi penal: alternatif penyelesaian perkara dalam hukum pidana. LaksBang Justitia.
Waluyo, B. (2022). Penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Wibowo, R. A. (2022). Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dan Pengadaan Barang Jasa Pemerintah: Pendekatan Perbandingan Hukum. Ugm Press.
Yusni, M. (2020). Keadilan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Perspektif Kejaksaan. Airlangga University Press.
IMRAN, I. (2023). Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru.
Sopiyati, S., Hidayatulloh, S., & Arifin, O. C. M. (2025). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pelapor dalam kasus tindakan pidana korupsi. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 3(2), 454-467.
Kahar, M. P., Rahmatullah, K. L., Yuris, F., Azizah, A., & Prihatmini, S. (2023). Delik suap dan gratifikasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi: Studi kasus putusan hakim dalam praktik penegakan hukum. Jurnal Anti Korupsi, 13(1), 46-58.
IRAWATI, D. (2020). DEKRIMINALISASI TINDAK PIDANA GRATIFIKASI MENJADI SUAP DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN BERMARTABAT (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).
Hamdani, H. S. (2023). Tindak pidana korupsi dalam bentuk gratifikasi. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 2946-2959
Sudirman, S., Mas, M., & Hamid, A. H. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 3(1), 38-42.
Ismail, N. V., Wantu, F. M., & Tome, A. H. (2025). Ambivalensi Putusan Hakim: Tantangan dalam Upaya Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum Pilkades di Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2920–2933.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurfathiana F, Subekti Subekti, Dudik Djaja Sidarta (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
