Governing through Penal Policy: Criminal Law and State Control Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/k0n6rc71Keywords:
criminalization, human rights, penal policy, rule of law, state controlAbstract
Contemporary criminal law increasingly functions not only as an instrument for addressing crime but also as a mechanism of state control. The phenomenon of governing through penal policy reflects a shift in the role of criminal law from ultimum remedium toward a regulatory tool used to manage social behavior and political stability. This article examines the normative ambiguity surrounding the legitimacy of penal policy as a means of governance and its implications for the rule of law and human rights protection. Employing a normative juridical approach with critical and prescriptive analysis, the study reveals that the expansion of criminalization often lacks clear normative parameters, leading to overcriminalization, erosion of civil liberties, and legal uncertainty. Such developments risk undermining the legitimacy of criminal law and transforming it into an instrument of power rather than justice. The article argues for the necessity of normative limits on penal policy through the reaffirmation of the ultimum remedium principle, proportionality, and constitutional review mechanisms to safeguard democratic legal order and human rights.
Downloads
References
1) Corda, A. (2025). THE LEGITIMACY OF CRIMINAL LAW AND THE PERFORMANCE CRISES OF PENALITY. Criminal Law Forum, 36, 351 - 380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-025-09509-2.
2) Garland, D. (2022). The Current Crisis of American Criminal Justice: A Structural Analysis. Annual Review of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030722-035139.
3) Kadir, Z. (2025). Fear and Control: Rethinking Criminal Policy through the Lens of Moral Panic. International Journal of Law Analytics. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijla.v3i2.13.
4) Vorobey, P., Felyk, V., Niebytov, A., Matviichuk, V., & Vorobey, O. (2021). Nature and significance of the State’s criminal law policy. Artificial Intelligence, 10, 225-231. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2021.39.03.22.
5) Cliquennois, G., Snacken, S., & Van Zyl Smit, D. (2021). Introduction: Human rights, prisons and penal policies. European Journal of Criminology, 18, 3 - 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820986010.
6) Renzulli, I. (2021). Prison abolition: international human rights law perspectives. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26, 100 - 121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1895766.
7) Prabowo, T., & Sulaiman, A. (2025). Reconstruction of the Correctional System within the Framework of Criminal Justice. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY). https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v4i7.1450.
8) Marasabessy, F., Sugiri, B., & Ratnohadi, H. (2025). NON-PENAL POLICY IN PROSECUTION TERMINATION (RECONSTRUCTING CRIMINAL LAW THROUGH RESTORATIVE JUSTICE). IBLAM LAW REVIEW. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i2.605.
9) Mavronicola, N., & Pinto, M. (2025). Challenging punishment as the justice norm in the face of ongoing atrocities. Leiden Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156525100460.
10) Mubarokah, W., Mursyid, A., & Wulandari, C. (2025). The Urgency of Renewing the Theory of Punishment in the Formation of National Criminal Law Policy. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD). https://doi.org/10.55606/jurdikbud.v5i1.6389.
11) Teixeira, S., & De Lima Ferreira Gonçalves Cerqueira, D. (2024). Critical reflections on punitivism and the control policies defined by Brazilian federal law number 11,340 of 2006 (the “Maria da Penha” law). Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal. https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2024.12.00406.
12) Kalac, A., & Feuerbach, L. (2023). On (Measuring) Recidivism, Penal Populism and the Future of Recidivism Research. Godišnjak Akademije pravnih znanosti Hrvatske. https://doi.org/10.32984/gapzh.14.1.1.
13) Padmaja, T. (2023). Criminal Justice System in India. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.7590. ; Thalluru Padmaja. "Criminal Justice System in India." International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2023). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.7590.
14) Dubber, M. (2025). O processo penal no estado penal dual: uma análise histórico-comparada. Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais. https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2025v10n1p1-33.
15) Boda, Z., Tóth, M., Hollán, M., & Bartha, A. (2022). Two Decades of Penal Populism – The Case of Hungary. Review of Central and East European Law. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10060.
16) Karina, I., Suhendar, S., Syah, K., & Sarjono, A. (2025). The Development of Criminal Law in the Context of Human Rights Protection: Analysis and Implementation. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.55606/inovasi.v4i1.4587.
17) Nasir, T., Harefa, B., & Bakhtiar, H. (2025). Criminal Policy in Law Number 1 Of 2023 Concerning the Criminal Code. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i6-09.
18) Purwanti, M., Suseno, S., Idris, I., & Chandra, E. (2025). Indonesian Criminal Law Reform Policy Through the Classification of Fines in the Indonesian National Criminal Code (Attributed to Fines Sanctions in Law Number 63 Year 2024 on Immigration). Lex Scientia Law Review. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v9i1.21929.
19) Saputra, R., Setiodjati, J., & Barkhuizen, J. (2023). Under-Legislation in Electronic Trials and Renewing Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Comparison with United States). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67632.
20) Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Henny Saida Flora, Pramidazzura Alifa Rifqi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
