Legal Feminization: Dissecting Gender Inequality in Judges' Decisions in Sexual Violence Cases

Authors

  • Henny Saida Flora Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Author
  • Henry Aspan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/y6p4jb16

Keywords:

Feminization Of Law, Gender Inequality, Sexual Violence

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence (TPKS Law) in criminal justice practice with a focus on gender inequality in legal reasoning and judges' juridical arguments. The TPKS Law exists as a progressive legal instrument that emphasizes a victim-based approach and the principle of non-discrimination, as well as accommodates previously unrecognized forms of non-physical sexual violence. However, the effectiveness of these norms is still constrained by judicial practices that are often based on conventional legal paradigms and patriarchal biases. The normative juridical approach is used to analyze positive legal norms, court decisions, and feminist legal concepts, in order to assess the extent to which the principles of the TPKS Law are internalized by judges. The results of the study show that many decisions still question the credibility of victims and ignore the psychosocial dimension of sexual violence, thus perpetuating the practice of victimization. The low sensitivity of gender in legal considerations shows the need for legal feminization as an effort for epistemological and structural transformation in the judicial system. These findings underscore the importance of gender-sensitive judicial training and criminal procedure law reform so that the law can function as a means of substantive justice. This study recommends the integration of legal feminist values as a normative and interpretive framework in sexual violence cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adaramola, O. A. (2022). The Gender Influence in Law, Legal Concepts and Judicial Reasoning: Assessing its Contribution to Defining the Reasonable Person in English Law from Feminist Perspectives. Journal of Intersectional Social Justice.

Aditya, R., Karauwan, D. E. S., & Junaedy, A. (2024). Implikasi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS) Terhadap Proses Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Kabillah: Journal of Social Community, 9(2), 22-31.

Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634.

Gleason, S. A., Jones, J. J., & McBean, J. R. (2019). The role of gender norms in judicial decision-making at the US Supreme Court: The case of male and female justices. American Politics Research, 47(3), 494-529.

Jafar, S. M., & Wahyudi, W. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Kasus Pelecehan Seksual Oleh Tenaga Medis Di Indonesia. Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi Dan Tata Negara, 1(2), 60-67

Mahlil Adriaman et al., Pengantar Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Padang: Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah, 2024).

Malonda, E. G. A. (2024). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP PRIA YANG MENGALAMI PELECEHAN SEKSUAL. LEX PRIVATUM, 13(4).

Nadia, B. U. A. (2022). Adult romantic attachment pada wanita dewasa awal yang mengalami childhood sexual abuse (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).

Nova, E. (2025). Implikasi Yuridis Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Bagi Pembenuhan Keadilan Korban. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 9(1), 208-219.

Nova, E., & Elda, E. (2022). Implikasi Yuridis Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Korban Dalam Sistim Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Yang Berkeadilan Gender. UNES Law Review, 5(2), 564-579.

Novea Elysa Wardhani, Sepriano, and Reni Sinta Yani, Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum (Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia., 2025).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011).

Phahlevy, R. R., Purwaningsih, S. B., & Faizin, M. (2024). ADVOKASI DAN MANIFESTASI KEILMUAN PROFETIK Potret Gerak Advokasi Muhammadiyah dalam Politik Kenegaraan di Indonesia. Umsida Press, 1-141.

Putra, I. W. (2024). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL BERDASARKAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA (Studi Kasus Kejaksaan Negeri Kajen Kabupaten Pekalongan) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).

Ramadhan, M. D., & Lasmadi, S. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Pelecehan Seksual Sesama Jenis Ditinjau Dari Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Pampas: Journal Of Criminal Law, 5(2), 139-156.

Rangga Suganda, “Metode Pendekatan Yuridis Dalam Memahami Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 3 (2022): 2859, https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485.

Saputra, E. (2025). Mendesain Ulang Keadilan: Reformasi Hukum Perceraian dalam Sistem Peradilan Agama. JIMU: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 3(03), 1688-1707.

Sidik, I. A., & Suherman, A. (2024). Efektivitas Penerapan Hukum Perlindungan Perempuan Dan Anak Dalam Mencegah Kekerasan. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik| E-ISSN: 3031-8882, 2(1), 174-182.

Susiana, S. (2019). Pelindungan hak pekerja perempuan dalam perspektif feminisme. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 8(2), 207-221.

Tasane, R., & Manuputty, F. (2024). Partisipasi Perempuan dalam Politik: Antara Representasi dan Kebijakan di Kota Ambon. Populis: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 18(2), 185-205.

Utaminingsih, A. (2024). Kajian Gender: Berperspektif Budaya Patriarki. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Legal Feminization: Dissecting Gender Inequality in Judges’ Decisions in Sexual Violence Cases. (2025). Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian, 2(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.62872/y6p4jb16