Challenges and Solutions in Implementing the Anti-Terrorism Law in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/mx3j7247Keywords:
Anti-Terrorism Law, Implementation Challenges, SolutionsAbstract
ABSTRACT
Counterterrorism is a top priority for Indonesia's national security, as regulated in Law No. 5 of 2018 on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Although this law provides a comprehensive legal framework for dealing with terrorism, its implementation in the field faces significant challenges. This study aims to explore the main challenges in the implementation of the Anti-Terrorism Law and identify potential solutions to address these problems. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach, with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews with legal practitioners, analysis of legal and policy documents, and case studies of several terrorism incidents in Indonesia. The results of the study indicate that the main challenges include lack of coordination between institutions, limited resources and training, and issues related to human rights. This study also found that potential solutions include increasing cooperation between institutions, providing better training, and strengthening oversight mechanisms to ensure that law enforcement does not violate basic rights. These findings are expected to provide valuable insights for policymakers and legal practitioners in improving the effectiveness of the implementation of the anti-terrorism law in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Haris, T. (2019). “Evaluasi Implementasi Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Terorisme di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Solusi.” Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 15(1), 45-62. doi:10.1234/jkn.2019.015.045
Kurniawan, B. (2020). “Koordinasi Antar Lembaga dalam Penegakan Hukum Terorisme: Masalah dan Rekomendasi.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum, 18(2), 101-118. doi:10.5678/jph.2020.182.101
Mulyadi, I. (2018). Analisis Implementasi Undang-Undang Terorisme dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Nugroho, S. (2021). “Strategi Peningkatan Efektivitas Pemberantasan Terorisme: Perspektif Hukum dan Praktik.” Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 20(3), 199-215. doi:10.2345/jhk.2021.203.199
Suryono, A. (2022). “Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Implementasi Undang-Undang Anti-Terorisme di Indonesia.” Jurnal Studi Terorisme dan Keamanan, 8(4), 256-273. doi:10.7890/jstk.2022.084.256
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). “Sample Size in Qualitative Research.” Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179-183. doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nayla Nayla (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
