Literacy Development in Serui, Papua: Challenges, Educational Practices, and Community-Based Strategies in Remote Primary Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/6551kq05Keywords:
Literacy Development, Remote Education, Multilingual Literacy, Community Engagement, PapuaAbstract
This study aims to examine literacy development in remote primary schools in Serui, Papua, by analyzing the interaction between structural constraints, pedagogical practices, and community engagement. Unlike previous studies that tend to isolate these factors, this research positions literacy as both a cognitive skill and a sociocultural practice, highlighting the need for an integrated analytical framework in multilingual and geographically isolated contexts.
This study employed a convergent mixed-method multiple-case study design, in which qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently and integrated during analysis. The study involved six primary schools, 12 teachers, 6 principals, 48 students, and 24 parents selected through purposive sampling based on their active involvement in literacy practices. Data were obtained through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) assessments. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, while quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, followed by data triangulation to ensure validity.
The findings indicate that literacy outcomes are shaped by the interplay of structural limitations, multilingual instructional challenges, and community participation. Schools implementing culturally responsive pedagogy and community-based literacy programs showed higher reading performance (mean 66 WPM vs. 57 WPM). The integration of mother-tongue scaffolding and local storytelling significantly enhanced student engagement and comprehension. Based on these findings, this study proposes the Community-Integrated Literacy Framework (CILF) as a context-sensitive model for improving literacy in remote and multilingual settings.
Downloads
References
Ball, J., Kelly, S., & Coughlin, P. (2013). Mother tongue-based bilingual or multilingual education in early years: Approaches and challenges. UNESCO.
Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). Routledge.
Bickmore, K., Marshall, J., & McNaughton, S. (2018). Culturally responsive literacy instruction in multilingual contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.182
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
Gee, J. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (5th ed.). Routledge.
Kim, Y. S. G., Park, C., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). Is oral/text reading fluency a “bridge” to reading comprehension? Reading and Writing, 33(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09978-3
McNaughton, S. (2011). Supporting reading development in low-resource contexts: Community-based strategies. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11413853
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Moats, L. C. (2020). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (3rd ed.). Brookes Publishing.
OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing.
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
Piper, B., Schroeder, L., & Trudell, B. (2018). Oral reading fluency and comprehension in multilingual contexts. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12252
Snow, C. E. (2020). Reading development and difficulties. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 513–539. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051044
Street, B. V. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
Takala, M., Korpela, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2019). Family engagement and early literacy outcomes in rural communities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 27(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2019.1571221
UNESCO. (2017). Reading in the early grades: Key findings and implications. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2021). The right to education in a digital age. UNESCO Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Whitehead, R., & Fitzgerald, M. (2015). Literacy and community engagement in rural schools. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798414548682
World Bank. (2019). Ending learning poverty: What will it take? World Bank.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yenniwati Sinaga, Lirhan Lirhan, Susanti F Susanti F, Rafli Bondi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
