Transforming STEM Learning through PBL to Improve Computational Thinking Skills

Authors

  • Uswatun Hasanah Universitas Jakarta Author
  • Nuril Huda UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/eg19r163

Keywords:

computational thinking, higher education, PBL, STEM

Abstract

Transforming STEM education through Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has emerged as a central strategy for strengthening university students’ computational thinking (CT) skills in response to the challenges of the digital age and Industry 4.0. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of how PBL supports CT development within Indonesian higher education, particularly in relation to the Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka curriculum reforms. However, it remains unclear how PBL can be effectively implemented within STEM education to systematically optimize the development of students’ computational thinking. The core problem addressed in this study concerns the absence of a coherent pedagogical framework that integrates PBL-STEM to comprehensively foster key CT components. Accordingly, this study examines the extent to which the application of PBL strengthens university students’ computational thinking within the context of the Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka curriculum. Using a systematic literature review approach, the study synthesizes 35 peer-reviewed publications indexed in SINTA and Scopus from 2017 to 2024, along with relevant national and international education policy documents. The findings indicate that PBL effectively enhances the five core components of CT, namely problem decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, algorithmic design, and iterative evaluation. PBL also promotes students’ creativity, collaboration, and reflective reasoning in addressing real-world, technology-driven problems across STEM disciplines. Nevertheless, challenges persist, including lecturer readiness, disparities in digital infrastructure, and the limited availability of standardized CT assessment frameworks. The study underscores the importance of strengthening pedagogical capacity, improving digital learning ecosystems, and adopting process-oriented assessment models to ensure sustainable PBL-STEM implementation in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Momani, M., Bataineh, R., & Aljarrah, A. (2023). Enhancing computational thinking through microcontroller-based STEM projects. Journal of STEM Education, 24(2), 55–68.

Chen, Y. (2021). Project-based learning and digital capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7983–8004.

Creswell, J. W. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Sage.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2020). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 258–266.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2019). The learning-sciences perspective on PBL. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 239–243.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek RI.

Kim, S., & Park, J. (2019). CT for future engineers. IEEE Access, 7, 10288–10296.

Latin, R., Putra, D., & Manopo, M. (2022). Enhancing computational thinking through project-based learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 501–518.

Lee, J., & Ko, Y. (2022). Effects of PBL on computational thinking in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(5), 1450–1466.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis (4th ed.). Sage.

OECD. (2020). AI and the Future of Skills. OECD Publishing.

Pratama, R., & Ismail, M. (2022). Collaborative PBL and CT skills. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 123–134.

Rahmawati, F., & Supriyadi, T. (2021). Problem-based learning and CT in Indonesian higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 27(3), 345–359.

Rizal, A., & Hidayat, T. (2023). Penerapan CT dalam kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 12(1), 88–102.

Saputra, H., Fadhilah, R., & Nurhayati, E. (2022). PBL-based STEM to foster computational thinking in engineering. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 8(1), 15–29.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Suwono, H., et al. (2020). STEM education in Indonesian universities. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 14–22.

UNESCO. (2022). Digital learning and computational thinking competency framework. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO Bangkok. (2021). STEM and digital innovation in Asia. UNESCO.

Widodo, A., Ramdani, R., & Priatna, M. (2023). Challenges of CT-STEM implementation in Indonesian universities. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 29(2), 177–190.

Wing, J. (2017). Computational thinking: What and why? Communications of the ACM, 60(1), 32–35.

Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2020). Systematic review methodology in education research. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 1–35.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Transforming STEM Learning through PBL to Improve Computational Thinking Skills. (2025). Journal of Pedagogi, 2(6), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.62872/eg19r163

Similar Articles

1-10 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.