The Political Direction Of The Law On The Establishment Of The Capital City Of Nusantara: Analysis Of Interests, Public Participation, And Regulatory Legitimacy

Authors

  • Maulida Khairunnisa Universitas Satyagama Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/ij.v2i10.55

Keywords:

Administrative Law, Capital Relocation, Constitutional Legitimacy, IKN Law, Public Participation.

Abstract

This article examines the legal politics of Indonesia’s new capital, Ibu Kota Nusantara, by analyzing political interests, public participation, and the regulatory legitimacy of Law No. 3 of 2022. Using a normative juridical method, combined with constitutional and administrative law analysis, the study reveals that the formation of the IKN Law reflects strong executive centralization and strategic political objectives that influence the institutional design of the IKN Authority. Despite its national strategic status, the legislative process displayed limited transparency, minimal stakeholder involvement, and accelerated deliberation, raising concerns regarding compliance with constitutional participatory standards. The exceptional governance structure granted to the IKN Authority also presents challenges related to democratic accountability, land governance discretion, environmental safeguards, and oversight mechanisms. Procedural deficiencies at the legislative stage risk generating long-term legitimacy deficits that may extend into derivative regulations governing land use, investment, and environmental management. The study concludes that while the IKN project is framed as a transformative development agenda, its regulatory framework requires stronger participatory mechanisms, clearer oversight structures, and enhanced protections for local and indigenous communities to ensure long-term constitutional and political legitimacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2020). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Bahzar, M. (2024). Impacts of the development of a new city on the life of indigenous communities: A case from Nusantara Capital City (IKN), Indonesia. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(8), 166-171..

Brunet, M. (2021). Making sense of a governance framework for megaprojects: The challenge of finding equilibrium. International Journal of Project Management, 39(4), 406-416.

Gusman, D., & Syofyan, Y. (2023). Public participation in legislation (legal comparation studies in Indonesia, South Africa, And United State). Nagari Law Review, 6(2), 133-145.

Hanakata, N. C., & Gasco, A. (2018). The Grand Projet politics of an urban age: Urban megaprojects in Asia and Europe. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1-10.

Henderson, B. (2025). Maintaining Legitimacy: Artificial Intelligence, Automated Decision Making, and Reasonableness Review Under Canadian Administrative Law. UBCL Rev., 58, 415..

Iristian, Y. (2024). Ensuring Administrative Legality and Justice Through Judicial Review in Indonesia. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(3).

Jakimow, T. (2018). Beyond ‘state ibuism’: Empowerment effects in state‐led development in Indonesia. Development and Change, 49(5), 1143-1165.

Jiang, W., & Martek, I. (2024). Strategies for managing the political risk of investing in infrastructure projects, in developing countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(10), 4079-4098.

Kysar, R. M. (2019). Dynamic Legislation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 809-868.

Lakaev, O. A. (2022). Legal regulation of the system of public administration entities providing the administrative and legal regime of special economic zones. Law enforcement, 6(2), 134-146..

Marzuki, M. (2022). Towards Balanced Bicameralism: Reconstruction of Law-making powers in Indonesian Representative Institutions. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 5(2), 128-142.

Murdhani, L. A. (2025). The Implementation of Digital Governance in Indonesia: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Scientific Research, 2(01).

Nagin, D. S., & Telep, C. W. (2017). Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual review of law and social science, 13(1), 5-28.

Poelzer, G., & Yu, S. (2021). All trust is local: Sustainable development, trust in government and legitimacy in northern mining projects. Resources policy, 70, 101888.

Popelier, P. (2021). Dynamic federalism: A new theory for cohesion and regional autonomy. Routledge.

Rachman, C. I., Ruzz, M., & Rosida, N. (2025). Implications of The Establishment of The IKN Authority on The Structure and Authority of The East Kalimantan Province Regional Government. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 5806-5826.

Roux, T. (2018). Indonesia's Judicial Review Regime in Comparative Perspective. Const. Rev., 4, 188, 18(1), 21–40.

Sayer, J., Boedhihartono, A. K., Langston, J. D., Margules, C., Riggs, R. A., & Sari, D. A. (2021). Governance challenges to landscape restoration in Indonesia. Land use policy, 104, 104857.

Triyanti, A., Indrawan, M., Nurhidayah, L., & Marfai, M. A. (2023). Environmental Governance in Indonesia (p. 513). Springer Nature.

Wardana, D. J., Sukardi, S., & Salman, R. (2023). Public participation in the law-making process in indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 30(1), 66-77.

Yescombe, E. R., & Farquharson, E. (2018). Public-private partnerships for infrastructure: Principles of policy and finance. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Political Direction Of The Law On The Establishment Of The Capital City Of Nusantara: Analysis Of Interests, Public Participation, And Regulatory Legitimacy. (2025). Ipso Jure , 2(10), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.62872/ij.v2i10.55

Similar Articles

11-20 of 150

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.