Artificial Intelligence Legal Subjects? A Critical Analysis of the Limitations of Modern Legal Personification

Authors

  • Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta Author
  • Ojang Oo Muptiah Universitas Islam Kh Ruhiat Cipasung Author
  • Taqyuddin Kadir Universitas Jayabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/6baw8m59

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Personification of the Law, Legal Liability

Abstract

The development of increasingly autonomous artificial intelligence has challenged the conceptual foundations of modern law, particularly related to the concept of legal subjects and legal accountability mechanisms. The Indonesian legal system until now does not have a specific regulation that explicitly regulates the legal status of artificial intelligence, so the regulation still depends on Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions which places artificial intelligence as part of the electronic system. This approach departs from the assumption of human control that is increasingly difficult to maintain as adaptive capabilities and independent decision-making by technology increases. This condition creates a legal vacuum that has an impact on the uncertainty of responsibility attribution when artificial intelligence causes legal consequences. This study aims to critically analyze the position of artificial intelligence in the Indonesian legal system, relevant legal accountability models, and the limitations of modern legal personification. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and analytical-critical approach. The results of the study show that granting the status of legal subjects to artificial intelligence has the potential to cause normative distortions and weaken the principle of human accountability. Therefore, legal reform should be directed at strengthening risk-based regulations by affirming human responsibility as the main normative actor, in order to maintain legal certainty and substantive justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amboro, F. Y. P., & Komarhana, K. (2021). Prospek Kecerdasan Buatan Sebagai Subjek Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia [Prospects of Artificial Intelligence As a Subject of Civil Law in Indonesia]. Law Review, 145-172. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i2.3513

Ardania, V. D., & Damayanti, S. (2025). Kedudukan Artificial Intelligence sebagai Subjek Hukum dalam Sistem Kontrak Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.51903/tqd5q337

Atiyah, A., Fitriani, N. C., & Yamani, A. Z. (2025). Digitalisasi Legal Drafting Melalui Artificial Intelligence: Peluang Dan Tantangan Masa Depan Dokumen Hukum Di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(2), 1283-1299. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i2.1113

Azis, M. A., Rahman, N., & Putri, R. A. K. (2025). BETWEEN THE FUTURE OR JUST UTOPIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL PERSONHOOD OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON THE CLAIM AS A PATENT INVENTOR. Critical Legal Review, 2(1), 58-83.

Boch, A., Hohma, E., & Trauth, R. (2022). Towards an accountability framework for AI: Ethical and legal considerations. Institute for Ethics in AI, Technical University of Munich: Munich, Germany.

Bublitz, J.C. Might artificial intelligence become part of the person, and what are the key ethical and legal implications?. AI & Soc 39, 1095–1106 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01584-y

Chesterman, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 819-844 10.1017/S0020589320000366

Haris, M. T. A. R., & Tantimin, T. (2022). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 8(1), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v8i1.44408

Jumantoro, T. R. P. (2024). Menilik Pro dan Kontra Pemanfaatan dan Penetapan Status Hukum Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Journal of Analytical Research, Statistics and Computation, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4590/jarsic.v3i1.28

Yuliya S. Kharitonova (2023). Legal Means of Providing the Principle of Transparency of the Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1 (eng) (2). doi: 10.21202/jdtl.2023.14

Kurniawan, I. (2023). Analisis Terhadap Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana. Mutiara: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 1(1), 35-44 https://doi.org/10.61404/jimi.v1i1.4

Luzan, T., & Kurki, V. A. (2020). Legal personhood of artificial intelligence. Univ Helsinki.

Maskanah, U. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Civil Justice: Comparative Legal Analysis and Practical Frameworks for Indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 7(1), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.27786

Novelli, C., Floridi, L., Sartor, G., & Teubner, G. (2025). AI as legal persons: Past, patterns, and prospects. Journal of Law and Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70021

Ramli, T. S., Ramli, A. M., Mayana, R. F., Ramadayanti, E., & Fauzi, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence as object of intellectual property in Indonesian law. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 26(2), 142-154 https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12264

Ravizki, E. N., & Yudhantaka, L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum: Tinjauan Konseptual dan Tantangan Pengaturan di Indonesia. Notaire, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v5i3.39063

Respati, A. A. (2024). Reformulasi UU ITE terhadap artificial intelligence dibandingkan dengan Uni Eropa dan China AI Act Regulation. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(3), 1737-1758. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.10578

Wahyudi, B. R. (2025). Tantangan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Berbasis Teknologi AI. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(1), 3436-3450. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i1.17519

Wibowo, A. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum dan Teknologi. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 1-168.

Wojtczak, S. Endowing Artificial Intelligence with legal subjectivity. AI & Soc 37, 205–213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01147-7

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence Legal Subjects? A Critical Analysis of the Limitations of Modern Legal Personification. (2026). Ipso Jure , 2(12), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.62872/6baw8m59

Similar Articles

41-50 of 164

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.