Corporate Criminal Responsibility in Land Grabbing Crime

Authors

  • Frans Reumi Universitas Cenderawasih Papua Author
  • Agus Iskandar PP Universitas Terbuka Author
  • Mawarni Fatma Universitas Gajah Putih Takengon Aceh Tengah Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/rcxyps74

Keywords:

Agria, Corporation, Land-Grabbing

Abstract

Land grabbing by corporate entities is a form of structural crime that has a wide impact on land rights, the environment, and social justice in Indonesia. This practice is carried out through various manipulative mechanisms such as falsification of documents, power co-optation, and legal-formal but socially illegitimate land tenure. Unfortunately, the national criminal law framework has not been fully able to reach the complexity of these corporate crimes. This study aims to analyze corporate criminal liability in agrarian crimes with a normative juridical approach through a study of the Criminal Code, UUPA, and PPLH Law. The theory of corporate criminal liability and the concept  of piercing the corporate veil are used to connect structural errors in the corporate body with criminal offenses that occur. The results of the study show that there are normative gaps and weaknesses in law enforcement, especially in making corporations the subject of crime effectively. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate criminal, agrarian, and environmental law, as well as the establishment of special criminal norms that are lex specialis in agrarian law. The novelty of this research lies in the offer of reconstruction of corporate criminal law enforcement based on substantive justice. This reform is expected to be able to encourage agrarian sovereignty and the protection of people's constitutional rights

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, M. A. (2024). Kebijakan hukum pidana terkait penjatuhan hukuman dalam kejahatan lingkungan hidup. Jurnal hukum dan kebijakan publik, 6(3).

ANDIONO, A. (2025). PENERAPAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KORPORASI DALAM KASUS PENCUCIAN UANG (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).

Apdoni, T., Simbala, Y., & Umbas, R. R. (2025). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Penyerobotan Tanah Menurut Hukum Pidana. LEX PRIVATUM, 16(1).

Arba'Satryadin, M. (2024). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA MAFIA TANAH: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PN TANJUNGPINANG NOMOR 144/Pid. B/2022/PN TPG. UIR Law Review, 8(2), 121-140.

Bayangkara, B. A., Tehupeiory, A., & Napitupulu, D. R. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Di Perumahan Forest Hill (Pihak Ketiga) Atas Perampasan Asset Tanah Oleh Negara Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi PT. ASABRI. Action Research Literate, 8(5), 1-5.

Constantin, C., Luminița, C., & Vasile, A. J. (2017). Land grabbing: A review of extent and possible consequences in Romania. Land use policy, 62, 143-150.

Dam-de Jong, D. (2019). Ignorantia facti excusat?: The viability of due diligence as a model to establish international criminal accountability for corporate actors purchasing natural resources from conflict zones. In Accountability, International Business Operations and the Law (pp. 126-144). Routledge.

Joko, D. J. S., & SH, M. (2021). Perkembangan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam sistem hukum pidana di Indonesia. Kepel Press.

Junaedi, A. M., & Setyadi, Y. (2025). ANALISIS POTENSI PELANGGARAN HAM DALAM KASUS PENYELUNDUPAN KAYU (ILLEGAL LOGGING): PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEBERLANJUTAN LINGKUNGAN. JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION, 4(1), 101-110.

Mahlil Adriaman et al., Pengantar Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Padang: Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah, 2024).

Novea Elysa Wardhani, Sepriano, and Reni Sinta Yani, Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum (Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia., 2025).

Novilia, V., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Efektivitas Sanksi Hukum Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Khusus: Perspektif Hukuman Ekonomi Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Korporasi. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), 5364-5378.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011).

Rangga Suganda, “Metode Pendekatan Yuridis Dalam Memahami Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 3 (2022): 2859, https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485.

Salsabila, D. (2020). Rekonstruksi problematika pertanggungjawaban pidana korupsi korporasi: Kajian normatif kedudukan hukum diametral badan usaha milik negara. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 50(1), 19-43.

Sepei, A. R., & Yuwafi, R. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kejahatan Lingkungan Tentang Pencemaran Udara Akibat Kebakaran Hutan: Analisis Perspektif Hukum Internasional (Doctoral dissertation, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM).

Silaban, R. (2022). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Nilai Keadilan (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS ISLAM SULTAN AGUNG).

Sukananda, S. (2021). Analisis Hukum Bentuk Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penyerobotan Tanah di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 2(3), 160-169.

Sukardi, S. (2022). Reconstruction of financial crime investigation methods in law enforcement in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. Unnes Law Journal, 8(1), 133-158.

Widyaningrum, T., Khoirunnisa, K., & Jubaidi, D. (2024). Corporate Criminal Liability: An Analysis of Corporate Crime Perpetrators under Positive Law in Indonesia. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 9(2), 146-157.

Yang, B., & He, J. (2021). Global land grabbing: A critical review of case studies across the world. Land, 10(3), 324.

Yusni, M., & Sigalingging, B. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Rangka Untuk Deterrence Effect Dan Effective Detterence. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(2), 425-437.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-20

How to Cite

Corporate Criminal Responsibility in Land Grabbing Crime. (2025). Ipso Jure , 2(7), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.62872/rcxyps74