Integrating AI-Driven Advanced Knowledge Management Systems to Mitigate Civil Servants' Risk

Authors

  • Andi Agus Salim Universitas Komputer Indonesia Author
  • Hasbu Naim Syaddad Universitas Komputer Indonesia Author
  • Luki Ishwara Universitas Komputer Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/rftf7g69

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, knowledge management, civil servants, public administration, risk mitigation, generative AI governance

Abstract

The rapid digitalization of public administration has positioned artificial intelligence (AI) as a strategic lever for strengthening institutional knowledge and reducing operational risk among civil servants. Yet public organizations continue to struggle with fragmented knowledge repositories, tacit knowledge loss due to workforce turnover, inconsistent decision-making, and exposure to compliance, legal, and reputational risks arising from manual and siloed information practices. This study examines how an AI-Driven Advanced Knowledge Management System (AI-AKMS) can be integrated into civil service institutions to mitigate such risks. Using a systematic literature review of twenty-five peer-reviewed sources published between 2021 and 2026, the study synthesizes evidence on AI-enabled knowledge capture, retrieval-augmented generation, predictive risk analytics, and generative AI governance in public administration. The novelty of this study lies in proposing an integrated conceptual framework that links AI-based knowledge management functions directly to specific civil-service risk categories, namely compliance risk, decision risk, knowledge-continuity risk, and reputational risk, an integration rarely addressed jointly in prior literature. Findings indicate that AI-AKMS adoption improves knowledge retrieval accuracy, accelerates policy compliance checking, and strengthens organizational resilience, provided that governance, data quality, and human oversight mechanisms are institutionalized. The study concludes with practical implications for public-sector digital transformation strategy and identifies avenues for future empirical validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamopoulos, I., Valamontes, A., Tsirkas, P., & Dounias, G. (2025). Predicting workplace hazard, stress and burnout among public health inspectors: An AI-driven analysis in the context of climate change. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15050065

Alavi, M., Leidner, D., & Mousavi, R. (2024). Knowledge management perspective of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25, 15. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00859

Alsammak, M., Majid, A. S. A., Allahham, M., & Alrwashdeh, M. (2026). The nexus between AI-driven capabilities and knowledge systems in digital business environments. Knowledge and Performance Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(1).2026.09

Alves, M., Seringa, J., Silvestre, T., & Magalhães, T. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence tools in supporting decision-making in hospital management. BMC Health Services Research, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11602-y

Alzubaidi, L., Al-Sabaawi, A., Bai, J., Dukhan, A., Alkenani, A., Al-Asadi, A., Alwzwazy, H., Manoufali, M., Fadhel, M., Albahri, A., Moreira, C., Ouyang, C., Zhang, J., Santamaría, J., Salhi, A., Hollman, F., Gupta, A., Duan, Y., Rabczuk, T., Abbosh, A., & Gu, Y. (2023). Towards risk-free trustworthy artificial intelligence: Significance and requirements. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2023, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4459198

Bengio, Y., Hinton, G., Yao, A., Song, D., Abbeel, P., Darrell, T., Harari, Y., Zhang, Y.-Q., Xue, L., Shalev-Shwartz, S., Hadfield, G., Clune, J., Maharaj, T., Hutter, F., Baydin, A., McIlraith, S., Gao, Q., Acharya, A., Krueger, D., Dragan, A., Torr, P., Russell, S., Kahneman, D., Brauner, J., & Mindermann, S. (2023). Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress. Science, 384(6698), 842–845. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn0117

Bodnari, A., & Travis, J. (2025). Scaling enterprise AI in healthcare: The role of governance in risk mitigation frameworks. NPJ Digital Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01700-4

Bratianu, C., & Bejinaru, R. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence and artificial knowledge in the knowledge management systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 19(1), 3171–3179. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2025-0242

Busuioc, M. (2021). Accountable artificial intelligence: Holding algorithms to account. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13293

Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Understanding managers' attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making. Technovation, 106, 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312

Hickok, M. (2024). Public procurement of artificial intelligence systems: New risks and future proofing. AI & Society, 39(3), 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01572-2

Howard, J., & Schulte, P. (2024). Managing workplace AI risks and the future of work. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23653

https://doi.org/10.1109/smartindustrycon65166.2025.10986153

Khazieva, N., Pauliková, A., & Chovanová, H. (2024). Maximising synergy: The benefits of a joint implementation of knowledge management and artificial intelligence system standards. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 6(4), 2282–2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/make6040112

Longo, J. (2024). The transformative potential of artificial intelligence for public sector reform. Canadian Public Administration, 67(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12587

Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2022). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101774

Mainardi, I. (2024). Change management: Artificial intelligence (AI) at the service of public administrations. AI & Society, 40, 3953–3981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02136-2

Nasseef, O., Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwan, A. A., Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based public healthcare systems: G2G knowledge-based exchange to enhance the decision-making process. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101618

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Governing with artificial intelligence: The state of play and way forward in core government functions. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/795de142-en

Pai, R., Shetty, A., Shetty, A., Bhandary, R., Shetty, J., Nayak, S., Dinesh, T. K., & D'souza, K. J. (2022). Integrating artificial intelligence for knowledge management systems – synergy among people and technology: A systematic review of the evidence. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 7043–7065. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2022.2058976

Parycek, P., Schmid, V., & Novak, A.-S. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation in administrative procedures: Potentials, limitations, and framework conditions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3

Schuett, J. (2023). Risk management in the Artificial Intelligence Act. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.1

Segovia, M., & García, J. (2022). Design, modeling and implementation of digital twins. Sensors, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145396

Semeraro, C., Lezoche, M., Panetto, H., & Dassisti, M. (2021). Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 130, 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469

Štefko, R., Frajtova-Michalikova, K., Straková, J., & Novák, A. (2025). Digital twin-based virtual factory and cyber-physical production systems, collaborative autonomous robotic and networked manufacturing technologies, and enterprise and business intelligence algorithms for industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3557

Steimers, A., & Schneider, M. (2022). Sources of risk of AI systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063641

Sueldo, C. S., Villar, S., De Paula, M., & Acosta, G. (2021). Integration of ROS and Tecnomatix for the development of digital twins based decision-making systems for smart factories. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 19, 1546–1555. https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2021.9468608

Tangi, L., Rodriguez Müller, A. P., & Janssen, M. (2025). AI-augmented government transformation: Organisational transformation and the sociotechnical implications of artificial intelligence in public administrations. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102055

Tsourma, M., Michail, D., Varlamis, I., Drosou, A., & Tzovaras, D. (2025). Legal assistance in low-resource languages: Evaluating RAG and fine-tuned LLMs for Greek e-governance. In 2025 3rd International Conference on Foundation and Large Language Models (FLLM) (pp. 366–373). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/fllm67465.2025.11391043

Vallée, A. (2023). Digital twin for healthcare systems. Frontiers in Digital Health,

Vatamanu, A.-F., & Tofan, M. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into public administration: Challenges and vulnerabilities. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040149

Walton, R., Ciarallo, F., & Champagne, L. (2024). A unified digital twin approach incorporating virtual, physical, and prescriptive analytical components to support adaptive real-time decision-making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 193, 110241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110241

Xu, J., Çelik, N., & Chen, C.-H. (2022). Real-time digital twin-based optimization with predictive simulation learning. Journal of Simulation, 18, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2022.2046520

Yan, M., Hong, L.-Y., & Warren, K. (2021). Integrated knowledge visualization and the enterprise digital twin system for supporting strategic management decision. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2021-0182 Zenkovich, M. (2025). Digital twin-driven decision-making support approach in adaptive control of production systems. In 2025 International Russian Smart Industry Conference (SmartIndustryCon) (pp. 1130–1135). IEEE.

Zhang, N., Bahsoon, R., Tziritas, N., & Theodoropoulos, G. (2022). Explainable human-in-the-loop dynamic data-driven digital twins. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods (pp. 233–243). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52670-1_23

Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1898691

Downloads

Published

2026-08-04

How to Cite

Integrating AI-Driven Advanced Knowledge Management Systems to Mitigate Civil Servants’ Risk. (2026). Technologia Journal, 3(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.62872/rftf7g69

Similar Articles

1-10 of 28

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.