Fragmentation of Social Solidarity in the Platform Economy Era: A Sociological Study on the Individualization of Work in Digital Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/rcwn9y92Keywords:
Digital capitalism, Gig work, Individualization of work, Platform economy, Social solidarity.Abstract
The rapid expansion of the platform economy has transformed labor structures and reshaped social relations within digital society. While platform-based work offers flexibility and entrepreneurial narratives, it simultaneously intensifies algorithmic control and individualization, raising concerns about the fragmentation of social solidarity. This study aims to analyze how the individualization of work in the platform economy contributes to the transformation and fragmentation of social solidarity, while also examining the emergence of new forms of digital collective identity. A qualitative sociological approach was employed using multiple case studies of ride-hailing drivers, couriers, and food delivery workers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, digital ethnography of online worker communities, and document analysis of platform policies. The findings reveal that algorithmic governance, performance ratings, and the “partner” ideology weaken collective labor identity and foster competition and isolation. However, workers simultaneously construct digital communities through social media and messaging platforms, enabling episodic and hybrid forms of solidarity. The study concludes that the platform economy produces a paradoxical dynamic: it fragments traditional social solidarity while generating new digitally mediated collective formations. Social cohesion in digital capitalism is therefore not eliminated but reconfigured within evolving socio-technical structures.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, M., & Taskin, L. (2021). The re-regulation of working communities and relationships in the context of flexwork: A spacing identity approach. Information and Organization, 31, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100364
Alauddin, F., Aman, A., Ghazali, M., & Daud, S. (2024). The influence of digital platforms on gig workers: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41491
Amalyah, A. (2025). Transformation of social structure in digital society: Analysis of network sociology. Mahogany Journal De Social. https://doi.org/10.37899/mjds.v2i3.202
Chan, N. (2025). Dynamics of platform architecture and labor unrest: Mobilizing and contesting solidarity in the 2021–2022 Foodpanda delivery rider strikes in Hong Kong. Social Media + Society, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251319578
Della Porta, D., Chesta, R., & Cini, L. (2022). Mobilizing against the odds: Solidarity in action in the platform economy. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 32, 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-022-00471-z
Diyammi, M. (2025). Digital disconnection or virtual unity? Navigating the paradox of technology and social bonds in Africa: A sociological literature review. Journal of Science, Innovation and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.58721/jsic.v4i2.1145
Khairullah, M., Novasari, R., Kartika, T., & Aryanti, N. (2025). Digital exploitation in the gig economy: A Marxian study on platform and online ojek driver relations. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.706
Permana, M. (2025). A typology of labour agency in the gig economy: Gig drivers' experiences of struggle in Indonesia during the COVID‐19 pandemic. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.70014
Poole, E., Giraud, E., Richardson, J., & De Quincey, E. (2023). Expedient, affective, and sustained solidarities? Mediated contestations of Islamophobia in the case of Brexit, the Christchurch terror attack, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231199452
Ridley-Duff, R., & Bull, M. (2021). Common pool resource institutions: The rise of internet platforms in the social solidarity economy. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2707
Rothstein, S. (2025). Solidarity across the platform: Mobilizing high-wage and low-wage workers in the tech sector. Work in the Global Economy. https://doi.org/10.1332/27324176y2025d000000036
Savka, K., Leta, A., & Bielova, M. (2025). Features of labour relations in the gig economy: Current challenges and prospects. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.01.50
Shostak, L., & Suriak, A. (2025). Transformation of the labor market in the context of economic digitalization: Challenges, models and consequences. Market Infrastructure. https://doi.org/10.32782/infrastruct84-9
Sun, P., Chen, J., & Rani, U. (2021). From flexible labour to ‘sticky labour’: A tracking study of workers in the food-delivery platform economy of China. Work, Employment and Society, 37, 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211021570
Van Minh, L. (2025). Gender, work, and digital labor platforms in Asia: A systematic review. International Journal of Social Science and Applied Technology. https://doi.org/10.64391/ijssat.v1i1.005
Wang, J., & Tomassetti, J. (2024). Labor‐capital relations on digital platforms: Organization, algorithmic discipline and the social factory again. Sociology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13192
Wang, S. (2025). Theoretical mechanism research on the shaping of digital economy in digital gig work participation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.bj24189
Zhang, C. (2025). Labor control in the platform economy from an ideological perspective. Communications in Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2025.21766
Zhou, Y., & Pun, N. (2022). Affording worker solidarity in motion: Theorising the intersection between social media and agential practices in the platform economy. New Media & Society, 26, 4885–4903. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221130474
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Randi Randi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





