Social Polarization in the Digital Age: The Mechanism of Echo Chamber Formation and Its Impact on Social Cohesion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/dhbvke44Keywords:
Digital Media, Echo Chamber, Social Cohesion, Public Sphere, Social PolarizationAbstract
The rapid expansion of social media as a digital public sphere has fundamentally transformed patterns of social interaction and opinion formation. While social media enhances participation and access to information, it simultaneously intensifies social polarization. A key mechanism underlying this phenomenon is the echo chamber, understood as a closed communication structure that reinforces opinion homogeneity and limits exposure to alternative perspectives. This study aims to systematically analyze the mechanisms of echo chamber formation in the digital era and their implications for social cohesion. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach following PRISMA guidelines, this research synthesizes findings from reputable academic journals addressing echo chambers, social polarization, and social cohesion. The findings indicate that echo chambers emerge through the interaction of algorithmic content personalization, users’ psychological tendencies such as confirmation bias and selective exposure, and digital network structures characterized by homophily and high clustering. Furthermore, the review demonstrates that echo chambers significantly undermine social cohesion by reducing intergroup trust, weakening bridging social capital, and intensifying affective polarization. This study concludes that social polarization in the digital era stems not from diversity of opinions, but from structural information isolation, highlighting the need for platform designs and policies that foster cross-cutting exposure and inclusive digital interaction.
Downloads
References
Andini, S., Adhani, D., Sartika, R., Kunci, K., Sosial, M., Politik, K., Muda, G., Politik, L., & Politik, P. (2025). Peran Media Sosial Dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran Politik Generasi Muda: Studi Kasus Generasi Muda Kota Bandung Di Era Digital. EDUSOS: Jurnal Edukasi dan Ilmu Sosial. https://doi.org/10.62330/edusos.v2i01.252.
Aurellia, D., & Katimin, K. (2025). Arah Baru Politik di Era Digital (Perspektif Generasi Milenial di Media Sosial). SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v4i2.5149.
Avin, C., Daltrophe, H., & Lotker, Z. (2024). On the impossibility of breaking the echo chamber effect in social media using regulation. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50850-6.
Batubara, F., Alya, J., Hasibuan, E., Berlianti, B., Lubis, A., & Sitepu, A. (2025). Dinamika Sosial Keluarga di Era Digital: Studi tentang Pola Komunikasi antara Orang Tua dan Remaja. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.55606/juitik.v5i1.1080.
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I., & Starnini, M. (2019). Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks. Physical review letters, 124 4, 048301 . https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.124.048301.
Botte, N., Ryckebusch, J., & Rocha, L. (2022). Clustering and stubbornness regulate the formation of echo chambers in personalised opinion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127423.
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
Daffa, D., Arthuro, D., Fernanda, J., & Pratama, M. (2024). Gen-Z: Eksplorasi Identitas Budaya dan Tantangan Sosial Dalam Era Digital. Jurnal Insan Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.59581/jipsoshum-widyakarya.v2i2.3112.
Del Vicario, M., Vivaldo, G., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook. Scientific Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37825.
Gao, Y., Liu, F., & Gao, L. (2023). Echo chamber effects on short video platforms. Scientific Reports, 13, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33370-1.
Geschke, D., Lorenz, J., & Holtz, P. (2018). The triple‐filter bubble: Using agent‐based modelling to test a meta‐theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 129 - 149. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12286.
Hobolt, S., Lawall, K., & Tilley, J. (2023). The Polarizing Effect of Partisan Echo Chambers. American Political Science Review, 118, 1464 - 1479. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055423001211.
Kim, L. (2023). The Echo chamber-driven Polarization on Social Media. Journal of Student Research. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v12i4.2274.
Ma, X., & Huo, Y. (2022). Does Social Media Users’ Interaction Influence the Formation of Echo Chambers? Social Network Analysis Based on Vaccine Video Comments on YouTube. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315869.
Modgil, S., Singh, R., Gupta, S., & Dennehy, D. (2021). A Confirmation Bias View on Social Media Induced Polarisation During Covid-19. Information Systems Frontiers, 1 - 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9.
Morales, G., Monti, C., & Starnini, M. (2021). No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit. Scientific Reports, 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81531-x.
Peralta, A., Ramaciotti, P., Kert'esz, J., & Iñiguez, G. (2023). Multidimensional political polarization in online social networks. Physical Review Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013170.
Ramadhani, A., & Jatnika, D. (2025). Dinamika Interaksi Sosial Remaja Di Era Digital Dan Peran Pekerja Sosial. Share : Social Work Journal. https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v14i2.59963.
Sasahara, K., Chen, W., Peng, H., Ciampaglia, G., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019). Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers. Journal of Computational Social Science, 4, 381 - 402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00084-7.
Schmidt, A., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Betsch, C., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2018). Polarization of the Vaccination Debate on Facebook. Vaccine, 36 25, 3606-3612 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.040.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Talamanca, G., & Arfini, S. (2022). Through the Newsfeed Glass: Rethinking Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers. Philosophy & Technology, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00494-z.
Terren, L., & Borge-Bravo, R. (2021). Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.028.
Törnberg, P. (2022). How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207159119.
Weydner-Volkmann, S. (2023). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers and Shared Experience. Ruch Filozoficzny. https://doi.org/10.12775/rf.2022.029.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zulham Zulham (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





