Evaluation of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) in Preventing Double Taxation in the Digital Economy Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/p3wqcd69Keywords:
corporate governance, institutional quality, leverage, profitability, tax aggressivenessAbstract
This study analyzes the determinants of tax aggressiveness in public companies by examining the interaction between firm-level financial characteristics, corporate governance structures, and institutional environments. Employing a quantitative panel-data design, the study evaluates 84 firm-year observations from Indonesia and Malaysia, using fixed-effects and random-effects models to test how leverage, profitability, firm size, ownership concentration, and governance quality influence tax aggressiveness measured through cash effective tax rates and book-tax differences. The findings indicate that higher leverage and profitability significantly increase tax aggressiveness, while stronger board independence and higher audit quality reduce it. Institutional factors, including regulatory enforcement, legal clarity, and audit intensity, moderate firm behavior and shape the extent of aggressive tax practices. The results reveal that tax aggressiveness is not driven by isolated variables but emerges from combined financial incentives and institutional opportunities. Firms in weaker regulatory environments exhibit higher aggressiveness, demonstrating the role of institutional quality in shaping compliance. The study concludes that reducing tax aggressiveness requires comprehensive reforms that integrate improvements in corporate governance with strengthened enforcement and regulatory clarity. The findings contribute to the literature by offering a multidimensional analysis that bridges firm-level and institutional determinants of tax behavior
Downloads
References
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2017). Are family firms more tax aggressive? Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 237–263.
Cobham, A., & Janský, P. (2019). Global distribution of corporate tax revenue losses. Journal of International Development, 31(2), 110–125.
Crivelli, E., De Mooij, R., & Keen, M. (2016). Base erosion, profit shifting and developing countries. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 268-301.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Huang, S. X., Moser, W. J., & Pereira, R. (2019). Corporate tax avoidance and debt financing. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 34(1), 104–132.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. W. (2019). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 94(4), 113–139.
Dyreng, S. D., Hoopes, J. L., & Wilde, J. H. (2016). Public pressure and corporate tax behavior. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 147-186.
Fernandes, O., Morrell, K., & Heracleous, L. (2021). How can governments tax multinational enterprises more fairly? A discourse analysis. Policy & Politics, 49(4), 495-512.
Gallemore, J., & Labro, E. (2018). The importance of corporate tax planning consistency. The Accounting Review, 93(2), 67–99.
Gebhart, M. S. (2017). Measuring corporate tax avoidance–An analysis of different measures. Junior Management Science, 2(2), 43-60.
Goel, A., & Goel, S. (2018). Has the'Permanent Establishment Rule'Outlived Its Utility in a Digitalized World?. NUJS L. Rev., 11, 25.
Hasan, A., Anwar, W., Zahir-Ul-Hassan, M. K., & Ahmed, A. (2024). Corporate governance and tax avoidance: evidence from an emerging market. Applied Economics, 56(22), 2688-2704.
Klassen, K. J., Lisowsky, P., & Mescall, D. (2016). The role of auditors, non-auditors, and internal tax departments in corporate tax aggressiveness. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 179-205.
Kovermann, J., & Velte, P. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance. Journal of International Accounting Research, 18(3), 87–106.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An international comparison. International Journal of Accounting, 53(3), 303–321.
Lisowsky, P., Robinson, L., & Schmidt, A. (2017). Do publicly disclosed tax reserves signal aggressive tax positions? The Accounting Review, 92(2), 169–198.
Minnick, K., & Noga, T. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management? Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 703–718.
Nebie, M., & Cheng, M. C. (2023). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value: Evidence from Taiwan. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2282218.
Olbert, M., & Spengel, C. (2017). International taxation in the digital economy: Challenge accepted?. World Tax J., 3.
Pinto, D. (2021). Allocation of taxing rights in the digital economy. Australian Tax Review, 50(1), 23–52.
Rely, G. (2025). The Role of Tax Consultants and Corporate Governance in Improving Tax Compliance of Manufacturing Firms. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 13(2), 373-384.
Shakow, D. J. (2016). The taxation of cloud computing and digital content. In Research Handbook on Electronic Commerce Law (pp. 573-598). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shaukat Malik, M., Irfan, M., & Munir, S. (2025). Corporate tax avoidance and firm performance: the moderating role of ownership concentration and board independence. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2448277.
Shome, P. (2021). Taxation of digital economy. In Taxation history, theory, law and administration (pp. 387-404). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Yahaya, M. B., Oon, E. Y. N., & Jusoh, R. (2025). Board structure, executive attributes and corporate tax avoidance: a systematic literature review. Asian Review of Accounting.
Yorke, S. M., Amidu, M., & Agyemin-Boateng, C. (2016). The effects of earnings management and corporate tax avoidance on firm value. International Journal of Management Practice, 9(2), 112-131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
