The Impact of Thin Capitalisation Rules on Corporate Tax Burden: Evidence from the Emergen Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/8hssj844Keywords:
emerging markets, leverage, profit shifting, thin capitalization, corporate taxation.Abstract
This study examines the impact of thin capitalization rules on corporate tax burdens in emerging markets, focusing on firm-level behavioural responses and policy effectiveness in Indonesia and Malaysia. Using a panel dataset of 78 firm-year observations drawn from 2015 to 2022, the study applies fixed-effects and random-effects regression models to assess changes in leverage, interest expenses, effective tax rates, and book tax differences following the implementation of thin capitalization rules. The findings indicate that the regulations significantly reduce corporate leverage and related-party interest expenses, consequently increasing cash effective tax rates among heavily leveraged firms. The results further show that firms engage in substitution toward non-debt tax planning channels when interest deductions are restricted, highlighting behavioural adaptability in response to regulatory pressure. Differences in regulatory effectiveness between Indonesia and Malaysia underscore the importance of enforcement capacity and administrative consistency in shaping compliance outcomes. The study concludes that thin capitalization rules contribute meaningfully to reducing debt-based profit shifting but require complementary tax governance reforms to maximize their impact. The results provide empirical insights relevant for policymakers seeking to strengthen corporate tax bases in emerging markets.
Downloads
References
Alfandia, N. S. (2024). How do countries curb their debt or profit shifting: a systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2344032.
Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2015). Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1-17.
Auerbach, A. J., & Devereux, M. P. (2018). Capital taxation in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 165–190.
Beer, S., de Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2020). International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes, and blind spots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 660–688.
Blouin, J., & Robinson, L. (2020). Double counting accounting: How much profit is shifted and why. Review of Accounting Studies, 25(3), 1234–1265.
Buettner, T., Overesch, M., Schreiber, U., & Wamser, G. (2019). The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics, 176, 106–123.
Chand, V. (2016). Transfer pricing aspects of intra-group loans in light of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan. Intertax, 44(12).
Chung, H., Kim, B. J., Lee, E. Y., & Sunwoo, H. Y. (2021). Debt financing and classification shifting of private firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(7), 921-950.
Cobham, A., & Janský, P. (2019). Global distribution of revenue loss from corporate tax avoidance: Re-estimation and country results. Journal of International Development, 31(2), 110–125.
De Mooij, R., & Hebous, S. (2018). Curbing corporate debt bias: Tax policy challenges. IMF Economic Review, 66(3), 511–542.
Fitriantoro, M. J., & Abbas, Y. (2024). Does Tax Policy Change Affect Tax Avoidance Behaviour? Evidence from the Thin Capitalisation Rule in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 145-168.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2019). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2–3), 255–272.
Janský, P., & Palanský, M. (2019). Estimating the scale of profit shifting and tax revenue losses related to foreign direct investment. International Tax and Public Finance, 26(5), 1048–1086.
Johannesen, N., Tørsløv, T., & Wier, L. (2020). Are less developed countries more exposed to multinational tax avoidance? Method and evidence from micro-data. World Bank Economic Review, 34(3), 790–809.
Kemmanang, L. F. (2021). Do thin capitalization rules crowd out multinational firms in Africa? Looking towards efficiency in revenue mobilization''. Economics Bulletin, 41(2), 594-603.
Owens, J., & Ndubai, J. W. (2023). Evaluating the interaction between and compatibility of the global anti-base erosion proposal with international trade rules. In The Elgar Companion to the World Trade Organization (pp. 506-534). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Procházka, P. (2020). Jurisdictions with lowest effective tax rates in the post-BEPS landscape: CbCR evidence and implications. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 15(1), 33-52.
Stevens, S. A. (2020). Evaluation of the Earnings Stripping Rules. EC Tax Review, 29(4).
Tell, M. (2017). Interest limitation rules in the post-BEPS era. Intertax, 45(11).
Tell, M. (2017). Interest limitation rules in the post-BEPS era. Intertax, 45(11).
Yossinomita, Y., Hartanti, R., Rosmeli, J. J., Fathiyah, F., & Suryani, A. (2025). The Impact of Tax Reform on Tax Ratios: A Comparative Analysis of the Transition from the Official Assessment System to the Self-Assessment System in Indonesia and Selected Asian Countries. Journal of Tax Reform, 11(2), 282-305.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
