Rethinking Civil Law Protection in Unequal Societies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/jzv9jz58Keywords:
civil law, legal protection, social inequality, substantive justice, private autonomyAbstract
Civil law is traditionally grounded in the assumption of formal equality among legal subjects, presuming that private autonomy and freedom of contract operate under conditions of equivalent bargaining power. In unequal societies, however, civil law relations are frequently shaped by structural disparities in economic resources, access to information, and social position. This article examines the normative foundations of civil law protection in the context of social inequality and questions the adequacy of formal equality as a basis for justice in private legal relations. Using normative juridical research with statute, conceptual, and case approaches, this study identifies normative ambiguity in civil law regarding the criteria for legally relevant inequality, the limits of restricting freedom of contract, and the consistency of legal protection across private relations. The analysis demonstrates that such ambiguity weakens legal certainty and renders civil law protection fragmented and ineffective. This article argues for a normative reconstruction of civil law protection grounded in substantive justice, treating private autonomy as a conditional principle and positioning civil law as a constitutional instrument for correcting structural inequality.
Downloads
References
Altwicker, T. (2022). Social justice and the judicial interpretation of international equal protection law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35, 221 - 244. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156522000048.
Bea, M., & Poppe, E. (2021). Marginalized legal categories: Social inequality, family structure, and the laws of intestacy. Law & Society Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12553.
Dewi, C., Lestari, I., & Nurjanah, S. (2025). The Urgency of Legal Protection for Weak Parties in Contemporary Contract Law. Advances In Social Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v3i4.434.
Dikrurahman, D. (2025). The Role of Courts in Addressing Social Inequality. Journal of Law and Social Politic. https://doi.org/10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.57.
Flora, H., Hartawati, A., Akhyar, C., Abrori, A., & Dewi, P. (2025). Civil Legal Assistance for Vulnerable Communities: Protecting Civil Rights in the Community. Abdimas Indonesian Journal. https://doi.org/10.59525/aij.v5i1.605.
Habib, Y., & Gilalo, J. (2025). Social Justice Theory in Indonesia Reviewed from the Philosophy of Law. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.995.
Mahfud, T., & Borman, M. (2025). Justice and Justice: A Study of the Role of Judges in Answering Society's Need for a Fair Law. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2360.
Mak, V. (2024). Redefining equality in European contract law: protecting consumer interests in a post-consumer society. European Law Open, 3, 561 - 586. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2024.42.
Mariyam, S., Arowosaiye, Y., Wibowo, A., Suryoutomo, M., Ausseil, R., Ulmer, M., Pazour, J., & , “. (2025). Legal Uncertainty and Its Implications for Innovation and Equality in Ride-Hailing. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i1.13083.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Matijević, M. (2024). Navigating through the substantive equality doctrine: Anti-discrimination law and social change. Pravni zapisi. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-49917.
Molla, E., Kochkorova, D., Ihnatiev, V., Smetaniak, M., & Kieliszek, Z. (2024). Study on the philosophical aspects of social justice and equality in modern society. Discusiones Filosóficas. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.2.
Pahlevi, A., Permatasari, N., & Kania, D. (2025). COMPARISON OF THE APPLICATION OF RESPONSIVE LEGAL THEORY IN RESPONDING TO SOCIAL CHANGE IN THE CRIMINAL LAW AND CIVIL LAW. Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v15i1.40023.
Rohman, S., Hawadi, L., & Batubara, I. (2025). Providing Justice To Women In Conflict With The Law. West Science Social and Humanities Studies. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v3i07.1986.
Setiawan, A., Sunandar, F., & Fajar, A. (2025). Social Justice and Human Rights: A Legal Perspective. Journal of Law and Social Politic. https://doi.org/10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.59.
Ștefănoaia, M., & Rus, M. (2025). The impact of respecting human rights and civil rights on the development of a democratic and inclusive society. Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Approaches in Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33422/icmhs.v2i1.1107.
Sudrajat, A., & Urbaningrum, R. (2025). The Impact of Legal Reforms on Social Equity. Journal of Law and Social Politic. https://doi.org/10.46799/jlsp.v3i1.63.
Weiss, B. (2025). Anticipatory discrimination: How attorneys’ assumptions about fact triers’ biases sustain race and gender inequality in the civil legal system. Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12399.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Digunakan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, khususnya Pasal 28D ayat (1) dan Pasal 28H ayat (2).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja beserta peraturan pelaksananya.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Theresia N.A Narwadan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
