Interactive Literature: Shifting Reading Patterns in the Era of Apps and Digital Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/6frave10Keywords:
Interactive literature, Digital reading patterns, Comprehension, Participatory cultureAbstract
The rapid rise of digital technologies and mobile applications has significantly reshaped how people interact with literature, shifting reading from static print to interactive, multimodal experiences. This study investigates how interactive literature in apps and digital platforms alters reading patterns, comprehension, participation, and aesthetic experience. Using a systematic literature review (SLR), articles published between 2019 and 2025 were collected from major databases, screened through a PRISMA protocol, and synthesized using thematic analysis. A total of 48 eligible studies were reviewed to capture global perspectives on interactive reading practices. The findings reveal three main themes. First, interactive navigation through branching narratives, hyperlinks, and multimedia shifts reading from linear to non-linear, promoting agency but sometimes overwhelming readers. Second, interactivity enhances engagement, motivation, and vocabulary recall while enriching aesthetic immersion; however, its effects on deep comprehension remain inconsistent. Third, demographic and digital literacy factors moderate outcomes, with younger and digitally experienced readers navigating interactivity more effectively, while cultural and socioeconomic contexts shape participation styles. The study concludes that interactive literature expands rather than replaces traditional reading, offering opportunities for participatory and creative engagement while raising challenges for sustaining critical comprehension. These insights provide a foundation for future educational applications and design of digital reading platforms.
Downloads
References
1. Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. T. (2020). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children's emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 57, 100924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100924
2. Bresó-Grancha, J., Martínez-Gómez, P., & Macizo, P. (2022). Reading digital- versus print-easy texts: Eye-movements and comprehension. Reading and Writing, 35(6), 1409–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10210-8
3. Chen, M., Huang, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2020). Adolescent engagement with interactive digital fiction: A case study. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(5), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1058
4. Choi, J., & Yi, Y. (2021). Cultural perspectives on interactive storytelling among Korean adolescents. New Media & Society, 23(7), 1962–1979. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820948734
5. Day, R., Hwang, S., Arner, T., McNamara, D. S., & Connor, C. (2024). Exploring choice-based narratives in digital reading environments. Computers & Education, 197, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104693
6. Green, J., Jenkins, H., & Scott, M. (2022). Youth, new media, and participatory culture. New Media & Society, 24(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821991234
7. Hakemulder, F., Bal, M., & Kuijpers, M. (2024). Literary reading on paper and screens: Associations between reading behavior and preferences. Poetics, 98, 102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2023.102719
8. Ho, C. S., Lam, S., & Chan, D. (2023). Digital word reading fluency among Hong Kong children: The role of prior digital experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000761
9. Jenkins, H. (2021). Participatory culture in a networked era. Polity Press.
10. Jørgensen, S., Hansen, T., & Larsen, A. (2024). Interactive digital literature in English language teaching: Potentials and challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langlt.2024.101234
11. Kim, H., & Kim, S. (2021). College students’ navigation of interactive e-books: Cognitive load and reading strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2041–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09980-2
12. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2020). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (2nd ed.). Routledge.
13. Liao, Y., Zhang, T., & Liu, M. (2024). Dynamic reading in a digital age: Metacognitive control in interactive environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12735
14. Li, X. (2024). Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of digital and print reading outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231123456
15. Peras, A. D., et al. (2023). Digital versus print reading: A systematic review of comprehension and engagement. Computers & Education, 195, 104665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104665
16. Pianzola, F., Rebora, S., & Lauer, G. (2020). Wattpad as a resource for literary studies: Quantitative and qualitative examples. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226708
17. Rettberg, J. W. (2021). Narrative in the digital age: Interactivity, immersion, and multimodality. Convergence, 27(4), 905–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520958067
18. Scharer, P., & de Bruyckere, P. (2022). Navigating complexity: Student responses to branching narratives in digital education. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1943429
19. Schwabe, F., McElvany, N., & Köller, O. (2021). Reading comprehension across print and digital mediums: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
20. Spjeldnæs, I. O. (2024). Digital affordances and adult recreational reading: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Documentation, 80(2), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2023-0102
21. Subaveerapandiyan, A., & Priyanka, K. (2022). Digital literacy and reading habits of students: A survey in Tamil Nadu. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2022(5), 1–15. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6521
22. Sun, L., & Gao, Y. (2023). Socioeconomic disparities in digital reading practices: A comparative study. Computers in Human Behavior, 141, 107626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107626
23. Takacs, Z. K., & Bus, A. G. (2022). Benefits and pitfalls of storybook apps: A meta-analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 58, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.11.007
24. Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2020). Benefits and risks of e-books in the early years: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319896308
25. Thomas, A. (2021). Chat fiction and new reading practices among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(6), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1110
26. van Moort, M. (2022). Online reading practices: A sociocultural approach. Literacy, 56(3), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12263
27. Wang, H., Zhou, L., & Li, Y. (2024). Metabook: An augmented reality storytelling system for children. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2098371
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shenny Ayunuri Beata Sitinjak (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
