Law Enforcement Against Transnational Cybercrime:Jurisdictional Problems and Regulatory Harmonization

Authors

  • Rahmatilah Rahmatilah Dosen UIN Alauddin Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/wafdhr93

Keywords:

Transnational Cybercrime, Jurisdiction, Regulatory Harmonization, Budapest Convention, International Criminal Law

Abstract

The rapid development of information and communication technology has given rise to the phenomenon of transnational cybercrime, which challenges conventional criminal law, particularly the doctrine of territorial jurisdiction. This article aims to critically analyze the jurisdictional issues in law enforcement against transnational cybercrime and the urgency of regulatory harmonization at the global and regional levels. Using normative legal research methods based on statute, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study finds that jurisdictional conflicts between countries constitute a structural obstacle stemming from the incompatibility between the concept of territorial state sovereignty and the borderless nature of cybercrime. Furthermore, harmonization efforts through the Budapest Convention have not achieved universal acceptability due to resistance from developing countries that view it as a Western instrument. Indonesia, as a country with high internet penetration, faces a dual challenge: limited domestic regulations and the absence of ratification of relevant international legal instruments. This study concludes that effective law enforcement against transnational cybercrime necessitates reform of international criminal law through an inclusive multilateral approach, strengthening of mutual legal assistance mechanisms, and transforming the jurisdictional paradigm from the principle of territoriality to the contextual effects doctrine principle.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aji, Muhammad Prakoso. "Sistem Keamanan Siber dan Kedaulatan Data di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Politik (Studi Kasus Perlindungan Data Pribadi)[Cyber Security System and Data Sovereignty in Indonesia in Political Economic Perspective]." Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional 13.2 (2023): 222-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/jp.v13i2.3299

Anwar, Syaiful, and Johan Edi Nepri. "Harmonisasi Hukum Digital: Tantangan Global dan Strategi Adaptif Indonesia dalam Era Kedaulatan Siber." Hutanasyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 4.1 (2025): 69-88. https://doi.org/10.37092/hutanasyah.v4i1.1297

Apsimet, N. M., and A. Zh Muratova. "On the possibility of using the provisions of the Budapest Convention on cybercrime in the investigation of crimes in the field of online fraud." Bulletin of the Karaganda University “Law Series” 11730.1 (2025): 87-97. https://doi.org/10.31489/2025l1/87-97

Ardhiwisastra, Yudha Bhakti. Imunitas Kedaulatan Negara di Forum Pengadilan Asing. Bandung: Alumni, 1999.

ASEAN. ASEAN Cybersecurity Cooperation Strategy 2021–2025. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2021.

Assafa Endeshaw. "Internet Regulation in Asia." Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2004, hlm. 105–131.

Atmasasmita, Romli. Hukum Pidana Internasional dalam Kerangka Perdamaian dan Keamanan Internasional. Bandung: Fikahati Aneska, 2010.

Brenner, Susan W. Cybercrime: Criminal Threats from Cyberspace. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.

Cassese, Antonio. International Criminal Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Citron, Danielle. Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.

Council of Europe. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention). ETS No. 185, Budapest, 23 November 2001.

Council of Europe. Explanatory Report to the Convention on Cybercrime. Budapest Convention, ETS No. 185, 2001.

Council of Europe. T-CY Guidance Note #3: Transborder Access to Data (Article 32). Cybercrime Convention Committee, 2013.

Djafar, Wahyudi. "Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional: Antara Kebutuhan dan Tantangan Implementasi." Jurnal HAM, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2022, hlm. 55–74.

Ferdian, Ardi. "Konstruksi Hukum Tindak Pidana Siber Lintas Batas dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2021, hlm. 312–330.

Goldsmith, Jack & Tim Wu. Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Goodman, Marc D. & Susan W. Brenner. "The Emerging Consensus on Criminal Conduct in Cyberspace." International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2002, hlm. 139–223.

Goodman, Ryan & Derek Jinks. Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Guiora, Amos N. Cybersecurity: Geopolitics, Law, and Policy. New York: Routledge, 2017.

Halder, Debarati & K. Jaishankar. Cyber Crime and the Victimization of Women: Laws, Rights and Regulations. Hershey: IGI Global, 2012.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.

Hildebrandt, Mireille. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.

Himawan, Budi. "Kajian Normatif terhadap Tantangan Penegakan Hukum atas Tindak Pidana Scam Lintas Negara di Era Globalisasi." Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, dan Hukum (SENPISHUM). Vol. 1. No. 1. 2026. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/senpishum/article/view/62473

Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden No. 28 Tahun 2021 tentang Badan Siber dan Sandi Negara.

Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden No. 82 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Infrastruktur Informasi Vital.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2006 tentang Bantuan Timbal Balik dalam Masalah Pidana.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2008 No. 58.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2016 No. 251.

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Global Cybersecurity Index 2022. Geneva: ITU, 2023.

Interpol. 2022 Cyberthreat Assessment. Lyon: Interpol Cybercrime Directorate, 2022.

Juwana, Hikmahanto. Hukum Internasional dalam Perspektif Indonesia sebagai Negara Berkembang. Jakarta: Yarsif Watampone, 2010.

Lotus Case (France v. Turkey). Permanent Court of International Justice, 1927, PCIJ Series A No. 10.

Mahler, Tobias. Generic Top-Level Domains: A Study of Transnational Private Governance. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2019.

Makarim, Edmon. Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2010.

Neumann, Insa. "The UN Cybercrime Convention: Will a Global Treaty Help or Hinder the Fight against Cybercrime?" Journal of International Law and International Relations, Vol. 19, 2023, hlm. 1–29.

Purwoleksono, Didik Endro. Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2014.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.

Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Sieber, Ulrich. "Mastering Complexity in the Global Cyberspace: The Harmonization of Computer-Related Criminal Law." dalam M. Delmas-Marty et al. (eds.), Harmonising Criminal Law. Paris: Société de Législation Comparée, 2008, hlm. 191–216.

Spiezia, Filippo. "International cooperation and protection of victims in cyberspace: welcoming Protocol II to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime." ERA Forum. Vol. 23. No. 1. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00707-8

Ulwan, Abdurrahman Nashih Wildan. "Strategi Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Siber Transnasional: Analisis Diplomasi Siber dan Kerja Sama Internasional." Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 7.1 (2026): 197-214. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v7i1.9049

Uni Eropa. Directive 2013/40/EU on Attacks Against Information Systems.

United Nations General Assembly. Report of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Expert Group on Cybercrime. A/AC.287/2021/CRP.4. Vienna: UNODC, 2021.

United States v. Morris, 928 F.2d 504 (2nd Cir. 1991).

UNODC. Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime. Draft February 2013. New York: United Nations, 2013.

UNODC. Cybercrime Module 1: Introduction to Cybercrime. E4J University Module Series: Cybercrime. Vienna: UNODC, 2019.

Watanabe, Shinya. "Territoriality and Internet Jurisdiction: Comparative Perspectives on Cybercrime Law." Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2020, hlm. 605–627.

Wibowo, Muhammad Singgih Imam, and Akhmad Munawar. "Kendala teknis dan hukum dalam proses penyidikan tindak pidana siber di Indonesia." Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5.7 (2024). https://rewangrencang.com/ojs/index.php/JHLG/article/view/641

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Law Enforcement Against Transnational Cybercrime:Jurisdictional Problems and Regulatory Harmonization. (2026). Ipso Jure , 3(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.62872/wafdhr93

Similar Articles

11-20 of 165

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.