Regulation of “Bilik Asmara” in Indonesian Correctional Institutions Between Human Rights and Security

Authors

  • Elvi Susanti Syam Institut Ilmu Sosial & Bisnis Andi Sapada, Pare-Pare, Indonesia Author
  • Andi Hartawati Institut Ilmu Sosial & Bisnis Andi Sapada, Pare-Pare, Indonesia Author
  • Sunardi Purwanda Institut Ilmu Sosial & Bisnis Andi Sapada, Pare-Pare, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/jves7410

Keywords:

Romance Room, Conjugal Visit, Prisoners' Rights, Correctional Law, Human Rights

Abstract

The arrangement of conjugal visits or "romance rooms" for inmates in Indonesia is in a state of legal vacuum, leaving its implementation to the discretion of non-standardized correctional officers. This normative legal research aims to analyze these problems from the perspective of human rights (HAM) and state administrative law, as well as formulate proposed policy reformulation. Using legislative, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study finds that current discretionary practices create legal uncertainty, inconsistencies, and are susceptible to abuse of authority, thus contradicting the General Principles of Good Governance (AAUPB). A comparative analysis of international jurisprudence (ECHR vs. the Italian Constitutional Court) and practice in different countries shows that although there is no absolute obligation, regulation-based conjugal visit arrangements are a global trend in support of rehabilitation goals. This study argues that the indefinite handover of authority to officers cannot be justified. As a solution, a policy reformulation model is proposed in the form of a Ministerial Regulation that comprehensively regulates principles, objective criteria, procedures, and accountability mechanisms. This regulation is recommended as a middle way to balance proportionately between the fulfillment of the right to personal life and the family of prisoners with the mitigation of security risks, in line with the mandate of Law No. 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atmojo, P. S., & Pangestuti, N. (2024). Gambaran Tingkat Depresi Narapidana Narkotika Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas 1 Tangerang. Jiip - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i1.3171

Hartawati, A., Paranrangi, A. A., & Syam, E. S. (2023). Perwujudan Membentuk Ketahanan Keluarga Dan Ketahanan Nasional Atas Peningkatan Pernikahan Di Bawah Umur. EJOIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(12), 1414-1421.

Bosi, G. (2025, June 10). Sex in Prison: The International Human Rights Framework on Conjugal Visits, Starting from the Case of Italy. EJIL:Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/sex-in-prison-the-international-human-rights-framework-on-conjugal-visits-starting-from-the-case-of-italy/

Chandra, T. Y. (2023). Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 11(01), 61–78.

CNN Indonesia. (2025, March 11). Apa Itu Bilik Asmara di Penjara? Legalkah di Indonesia? https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20250311154250-277-1207576/apa-itu-bilik-asmara-di-penjara-legalkah-di-indonesia

Daulay, R. M. A. (2023). Pemasyarakatan Profetik : Tinjauan Politik Profetik Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022. An-Natiq Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 3(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.33474/an-natiq.v3i1.18984

Dewi, D. A. S. (2016). Pendayagunaan Freies Ermessen Pejabat Pemerintahan dalam Konsep Negara Kesejahteraan. Yustisia, 5(1), 184–200.

European Court of Human Rights. (2021). Case of Lesław Wójcik v. Poland (Application No. 66424/09). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210957

Faisal, F., Jamaluddin, F., Hasima, R., & Tarta, A. F. (2021). Diskresi Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Pidana. Mulawarman Law Review, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v6i1.466

Gandaria, R. Y. (2015). Implementasi asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (AAUPB) dalam mewujudkan prinsip good governance and clean government di pemerintahan daerah. Lex Administratum, 3(6).

Ina Heliany and Muhenri Sihotang, ‘Implementation of Conjugal Visits in the Indonesian Legal System for Correctional Inmates’, International Journal of Islamic Education.

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan.

Irwanto, I., santosa, T. A., Ghoni, A., Jaya, A., & Hartawati, A. (2025). Literature Review: The Effectiveness of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(3), 4718–4723. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i3.2685

Kurniawan, A. (2023). Rehabilitasi dan reintegrasi sosial narapidana terorisme. Gema Keadilan, 10(1), 1–11.

Larasati, N. U., Nurhadiyanto, L., Zaky, M., & Rozak, A. (2023). Analisis Manfaat Dan Risiko Bilik Asmara Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Sebagai Upaya Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Seksual Narapidana. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 4(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v4i2.142

Lestari, V. E. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Kebijakan Conjugal Visit Dan Pengadaan Bilik Asmara Sebagai Upaya Preventif Pada Kasus Penyimpangan Seksual Oleh Narapidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis, 4(1).

Mawardi, Adv, et.al. 2025. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Cv. Harfa Creative. Bandung

Muhlizi, A. F. (2012). Reformulasi Diskresi dalam Penataan Hukum Administrasi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(1), 93–111.

Ni Nyoman Ome Tania Langden, et al. (2022). "A Legal Review of the Urgency of the Conjugal Visit Policy as a Fulfillment of the Rights of Prisoners." Journal of the Faculty of Law, Udayana University

Pettanase, I. (2019). Pembinaan narapidana dalam sistem pemasyarakatan. Solusi, 17(1), 57–63.

Putri, N. K., Salam, A., Ramadhan, A., Mulitalia, M., & Anasti, M. (2024). Pengaruh teori rehabilitasi terhadap kebijakan pemidanaan di Indonesia: Tinjauan pustaka. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(2), 210–224.

Saputra, F. (2020). Peranan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dihubungkan Dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan. Reusam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v8i1.2604

Saputra, R., Muttaqin, Z., Affandi, H., & Rompis, A. E. (2023). Discretion as a government policy innovation in Indonesia. Lex Localis, 21(2), 441–469.

Suparto, S., Adinda, F. A., Esanov, A. E., & Normurotovna, Z. E. (2024). Administrative Discretion in Indonesia & Netherland Administrative Court: Authorities and Regulations. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(1), 75–100.

Sutarto, S. (2021). Penerapan rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial terhadap korban penyalahgunaan narkotika ditinjau dari teori pemidanaan relatif. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 115–135.

Syam, E. S., Supriyanto, H. E., Hartawati, A., & B., S. (2024). Execution of State Administrative Judicial Decisions a Mirror of the Authority Court. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e2571. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2571

United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

United Nations. (2015). The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules).

Van Hout, M. C., Klankwarth, U.-B., & Stöver, H. (2025). Conjugal visitation rights, privileges and standards of provision inside European prisons: A socio-legal study of extant literature. Social Science & Medicine, 374, 117879.

Vladu, A., Kalebic, N., Audley, J., Stevens, A., & Taylor, P. J. (2021). Benefits and risks of conjugal visits in prison: A systematic literature review. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 31(5), 343–361.

Wulandari, S. (2023). Reintegrasi Sosial Dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan Sebagai Visi Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Nasional. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Dan Multidisiplin Ilmu (SEMNASTEKMU), 3(2), 26–36.

Zaelani, M. A., Handayani, I., & Isharyanto, I. (2019). Antinomi Diskresi dalam Bentuk Freies Ermessen untuk Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Berwawasan Pancasila. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 9(1), 64–80

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Regulation of “Bilik Asmara” in Indonesian Correctional Institutions Between Human Rights and Security. (2025). Ipso Jure , 2(11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.62872/jves7410

Similar Articles

11-20 of 124

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.