Measuring The Law On The Formation Of Laws And Regulations As A Touchstone Constitutional Review

Authors

  • Mochamad Djalil Bhayangkara University of Surabaya Author
  • Dewi Ratih Kumalasari Bhayangkara University of Surabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/f9hbej92

Keywords:

Constitutional Supremacy, Constitutional Review, Constitutional Touchstone

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional supremacy in shaping statutory regulations, positioning it both as a guiding framework and a binding compliance standard for the public particularly state authorities and their institutions. It argues that the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations serves as a definitive and legitimate benchmark in constitutional review. Nonetheless, practical realities reveal instances where the principle of utility can override arguments concerning formal defects in legislation and Government Regulations in Lieu of Law (Perppu). Employing a normative legal research method that integrates statutory and conceptual approaches, this paper provides a descriptive analysis of the issue. The findings indicate that constitutional review functions as an embodiment of constitutional supremacy through the judicial examination of laws, with the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations serving as a key parameter in determining constitutionality a parameter whose application continues to evolve.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buana, Mirza Satria. “Weak-Form Review and Judicial Independence: A Comparative Perspective.” Constitutional Review 10, no. 1 (2024): 65–92.

Djatmiko, Agoes, et al. “Juridical Review of Changes to the Decision of the Constitutional Court in the 2024 General Election Contestation.” Ganesha Law Review 6, no. 1 (2024): 88–107.

Fikriya, Makhyatul, et al. “Examining the Role of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislator.” Rechtsidee 19, no. 2 (2024): 121–140.

Gusman, Delfina. “Pembentukan Undang-Undang Secara Elektronik dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Progresif 4, no. 2 (2024): 175–188.

Kurnia, Kana. “Problematika Hukum Pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 21, no. 1 (2023): 45–62.

Nggilu, Novendri M., et al. “Rethinking Indonesian Constitutional Amendments: The Prospects and Perils of Judicial Review.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 9, no. 1 (2024): 1–24.

Putra, Antoni. “Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Baik dalam Revisi UU KPK.” Supremasi Hukum 17, no. 1 (2021): 35–52.

Rahman, Andriansyah, and Muthi’ah Maizaroh. “Strengthening Independence: Constitutional Interests as a Paradigm for Judicial Review in Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 13, no. 1 (2024): 50–72.

Siregar, Fadjar, et al. “Digital Transformation in Constitutional Adjudication: Enhancing Transparency and Accessibility.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Society 5, no. 2 (2023): 101–120.

Arliman, Laurensius. “Urgensi Penguatan Prinsip Supremasi Konstitusi dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 1 (2022): 15–38.

Huda, Ni’matul. “Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Indonesia: Problematika dan Solusinya.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 29, no. 3 (2022): 523–546.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan No. 130/PUU-XXI/2023. Jakarta: MKRI, 2023.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jakarta: MKRI, 2020.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, amended by Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2022 Nomor 143. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2022.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2020 Nomor 216. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2020.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. 2005. Model-model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 2025. Rekapitulasi Perkara Pengujian Undangundang.https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.RekapPUU&menu=18.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2009. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Reg. Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009. Jakarta.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2020. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Reg. Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jakarta.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2020. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Reg. Nomor 60/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jakarta.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2023. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Reg. Nomor 130/PUU-XXI/2023. Jakarta.

Maria Farida Indrati Soprapto. 1998. Ilmu Perundang-undangan Dasar-dasar dan Pembentukannya. Jogjakarta: Kanisius.

Maruarar Siahaan. 2010. Uji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang‐Undangan Negara Kita: Masalah dan Tantangan. Jurnal Konstitusi, VII (4).

Philipus M. Hadjon. 1987. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat-Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Susi Dwi Harijanti. 2020. Laporan Hasil Penelitian Pengujian Formil Undang-undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Urgensi dan Batu Uji. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/penelitian/pdf/ hasilpenelitian_edit_111_Laporan%20Hasil%20Penelitian%20UNPAD%20Web.pdf, hlm. 81.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-13

How to Cite

Measuring The Law On The Formation Of Laws And Regulations As A Touchstone Constitutional Review. (2025). Ipso Jure , 2(7), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.62872/f9hbej92