Legal Analysis of Trading in the Digital Age: Weaknesses and Enforcement Efforts in Indonesia

Authors

  • Dudi Mulyadi Universitas Cendrawasih Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/mwftad66

Keywords:

Capital Market Law, Digital Technology, Trading

Abstract

The development of digital technology has driven significant transformation in the trade and investment sector in Indonesia, especially in online-based trading practices. The integration of high-speed internet, big data, and automated trading algorithms makes it easier to access global markets, improve transaction efficiency, and expand public participation. However, these advances also pose legal risks, such as market manipulation, insider trading, investment fraud, and personal data protection breaches. Normatively, the regulation has been accommodated through Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning the Capital Market, Law No. 11 of 2008 jo. Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning ITE, as well as OJK and Bappebti regulations. However, the regulation has not fully anticipated the complexity of the digital ecosystem which is real-time and cross-jurisdictional. Challenges include limited surveillance technology, weak intergovernmental coordination, and low legal and financial literacy of the community. This study uses normative juridical methods with legal and conceptual approaches to assess the suitability, weaknesses, and needs of legal reform. The results of the study emphasized the urgency of regulatory harmonization, strengthening RegTech and SupTech, establishing an integrated law enforcement model, and international cooperation. This effort is expected to be able to build a digital trading ecosystem that is safe, transparent, adaptive to innovation, and globally competitive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahtiar, B., Lubis, E., & Harahap, H. (2021). Pengaturan Kaidah Manajemen Risiko Atas Penawaran Saham Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (Equity Crowfunding) untuk Pengembangan UMKM di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 3(2), 65-98.

Harahap, A. P., Triseptina, A., Ghafur, M. L., & Vientiany, D. (2025). Efektivitas Sanksi Administratif terhadap Ketidakpatuhan Pemotong PPh Pasal 21 dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan (UU KUP). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 2(01), 1698-1709.

Hawari, S. M. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Insider Trading Pasar Modal di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Hutabarat, S. A., Praja, S. J., Suhariyanto, D., Paminto, S. R., Kusumastuti, D., Fajrina, R. M., ... & Abas, M. (2023). CYBER-LAW: Quo Vadis Regulasi UU ITE dalam Revolusi Industri 4.0 Menuju Era Society 5.0. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Imanuel, T., & Fauzan, I. (2023). Analysis of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age in the Issue of Electronic Information and Transaction Law in Indonesia. PERSPEKTIF, 12(4), 1117-1126.

Kalesaran, A. A. (2023). Akibat Hukum Digitalisasi Perdagangan Saham Menurut Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Di Indonesia. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 11(2).

Kennedy, A., Al Hikmah, S., & Antara, I. B. G. S. W. (2024). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Praktik Insider Trading di Pasar Modal Indonesia: Tantangan dan Solusi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(3), 1257-1267.

Kozimov, N. (2024). " Retail Investor Protection in the Age of Digital Trading: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions.

Laita, R. H. (2025). Kritik Terhadap Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum Dalam Kasus Cybercrime Peretasan Platform Kripto Indodax 2024. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6(2), 218-228.

Lazaro, C., & Verges, T. J. (2022). The obligations and regulatory challenges of online broker-dealers and trading platforms. St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper, (22-0007).

Maharani, R., & Prakoso, A. L. (2024). Perlindungan Data Pribadi Konsumen Oleh Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik Dalam Transaksi Digital. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(1), 333-347.

Mahlil Adriaman et al., Pengantar Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Padang: Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah, 2024).

Manullang, H., Habeahan, B., & Nduru, I. (2023). The Politics of Criminal Law in Tackling Crimes Under the Guise of Electronic Investment in Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4484-4492.

Maulidia, G. (2023). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KEBIJAKAN KRIMINALISASI PENCUCIAN UANG BERBASIS CRYPTOCURRENCY DI INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Keadilan dan Hukum, 2(1).

Novea Elysa Wardhani, Sepriano, and Reni Sinta Yani, Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum (Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia., 2025).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011).

Purwogandi, B. (2023). Rekonstruksi regulasi penegakan hukum dalam upaya penanggulangan tindak pidana perbankan yang berkeadilan (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS ISLAM SULTAN AGUNG).

Rangga Suganda, “Metode Pendekatan Yuridis Dalam Memahami Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 3 (2022): 2859, https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485.

Santoso, E. (2022). Opportunities and challenges: e-commerce in Indonesia from a legal perspective. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(3), 395-410.

Sinaga, B. B., & Azzura, R. P. N. (2024). Peran Teknologi Blockchain Sebagai Instrumen Pembangunan Penegakan Hukum Berbasis Digital & Mewujudkan Masyarakat Berkeadilan di Era Society 5.0. Padjadjaran Law Review, 12(1), 71-82.

Siswanto, H., Putri, R. W., Dewi, E., & Tamza, F. B. (2025). Kejahatan Penipuan Investasi Fiktif Sebagai Refleksi Lemahnya Kedaulatan Penegakan Hukum di Tengah Intervensi Global. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 1789-1799.

Tambun, M. A., & Putuhena, M. I. (2022). Tata Kelola Pembentukan Regulasi Terkait Perdagangan Mata Uang Kripto (Cryptocurrency) sebagai Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset). Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(1), 33-57.

Yanto, S. E., & Santiago, F. (2024). The Legal Vacuum in Law Enforcement of Digital Currency Crimes by the Police. Journal of World Science, 3(12), 1576-1586.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Legal Analysis of Trading in the Digital Age: Weaknesses and Enforcement Efforts in Indonesia. (2025). Ipso Jure , 2(7), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.62872/mwftad66

Similar Articles

31-40 of 110

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.