Restorative Justice in the Digital Era: Criminal Law Mediation Through Online Platforms

Authors

  • Henny Saida Flora Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Author
  • Henry Aspan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/mb21wr19

Keywords:

Digitalization-Law, Criminal-Online Mediation, Restorative Justice.

Abstract

The paradigm transformation of criminal law enforcement from a retributive to a restorative approach reflects a response to the weaknesses of the conventional justice system that is rigid, slow, and lacks space for victim recovery. Restorative justice (RJ), as a dialogue-based and reconciliation-based approach, has been accommodated in Indonesian law through the SPPA Law and several other administrative regulations. However, the adoption of this approach in general criminal cases and its implementation online still faces serious legal challenges. This study uses a normative juridical method to examine the urgency of regulating digital-based criminal mediation (restorative justice digital/RJD) within the framework of the national criminal law system. The study focused on the limitations of the applicable positive law, the validity of the results of online mediation, the protection of personal data, and the potential for inequality of access for vulnerable groups. The findings show that without comprehensive and integrative regulation with the principle of due process of law, the implementation of the RJD risks violating constitutional rights and undermining the legitimacy of restorative justice itself. Therefore, it is necessary to synchronize criminal law norms, procedural law, the ITE Law, and the PDP Law to form an adaptive, inclusive, and accountable legal framework. The RJD can be a strategic innovation in criminal law reform, as long as it is carried out with legal certainty and strong human rights protection

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Mandari, M. W. N., Thalib, H., & Salle, S. (2024). Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Media Elektronik. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 1153-1168.

Salamiah, S. (2024). PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 16(2), 92-108.

Mariana, D., Gilalo, J. J., & Erbiana, N. M. G. B. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dalam Transaksi Pembelian Tiket Konser melalui Social Media Platform. Karimah Tauhid, 4(5), 2652-2667.

Cahyono, S. T., Erni, W., & Hidayat, T. (2025). RIKONSTRUKSI HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KEJAHATAN SIBER (CYBER CRIME) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA: Rekonstruksi Hukum Pidana terhadap Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Dame Journal of Law, 1(1), 1-23.

Indah, W. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA DI TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN BERBASIS HAK ASASI MANUSIA (Doctoral dissertation, Undaris).

Romero-Seseña, P. (2025). Applicability and uses of the online environment in restorative mediation: towards a digital restorative justice?. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 37(1), 75-93.

Mustopa, A. (2021). Implementasi mediasi berbasis luring dan daring/virtual serta kontribusinya terhadap penyelesaian perkara di Pengadilan Agama pada wilayah Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Mataram (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung).

Novea Elysa Wardhani, Sepriano, and Reni Sinta Yani, Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum (Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia., 2025).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011).

Mahlil Adriaman et al., Pengantar Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Padang: Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah, 2024).

Rangga Suganda, “Metode Pendekatan Yuridis Dalam Memahami Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 3 (2022): 2859, https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485.

Meliana, Y. (2025). Urgensi Formulasi Perlindungan Hukum dan Kepastian Pidana terhadap Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Deepfake dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7).

Abdulovna, D. D. (2024). Advancing Criminal Justice Reform through Restorative Justice: A Narrative Review. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 2(4), 274-285.

Triasari, D., Hanum, W. N., & Firmandiaz, V. (2023). Mapping Restorative Justice in Information and Electronic Transaction Criminal Regulation. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(1), 1-16.

Saliro, S. S., Aminah, S., Jamaludin, J., Aprilsesa, T. D., & Kusryat, D. (2025). Virtual Police in the Indonesian Constitutional System: A Restorative Justice Approach to Cybercrime Prevention (An Empirical Study in Sambas Regency). Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 10(1), 27-38.

Dewi, P. E. T. (2021). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Residivis Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 3(2).

Akbar, M. F. (2022). Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 199-208.

Panu, A., Moonti, R. M., & Ahmad, I. (2025). Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia Antara Diversi, Restoratif, dan Perlindungan Hak Anak. Politika Progresif: Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora, 2(2), 276-293.

Ferselli, A. K., Baloch, S. M. B., & Muflihah, R. (2025). Efektivitas Mediasi oleh Hakim Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris: Studi Kasus pada Perkara Nomor 1510/PDT. G/2020/PA. SMN. Notary Law Journal, 4(1), 42-56.

Cahyono, S. T., Erni, W., & Hidayat, T. (2025). RIKONSTRUKSI HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KEJAHATAN SIBER (CYBER CRIME) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA: Rekonstruksi Hukum Pidana terhadap Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Dame Journal of Law, 1(1), 1-23.

Dias Oliva, T. (2020). Content moderation technologies: Applying human rights standards to protect freedom of expression. Human Rights Law Review, 20(4), 607-640.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Restorative Justice in the Digital Era: Criminal Law Mediation Through Online Platforms. (2025). Ipso Jure , 2(6), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.62872/mb21wr19

Similar Articles

1-10 of 114

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.