The Role of Criminal Sanctions in Combating Minor Theft Crimes

Authors

  • Amalia Tasya Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/04g8rg55

Keywords:

criminal sanctions, petty theft, Criminal Code, legal effectiveness, restorative justice

Abstract

Petty theft is a form of crime that often occurs in everyday life and has the potential to cause social unrest. In the context of positive Indonesian law, petty theft is regulated in Article 364 of the Criminal Code which provides limits on the value of goods and forms of criminal sanctions. This article aims to analyze the effectiveness of criminal sanctions in overcoming petty theft and to examine the reality of law enforcement in the field. Through a normative and empirical legal approach, this study found that the application of criminal sanctions for petty theft often faces obstacles to effectiveness, especially in terms of the burden on the court, the condition of the perpetrator, and considerations of the values ​​of justice and benefit. Strengthening alternative case resolutions, such as restorative justice, is needed in an effort to create a more proportional and humane criminal system.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2014). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (2020). Naskah Akademik Revisi KUHP Nasional. Jakarta: Kemenkumham RI.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Statistik Kriminal 2021. Jakarta: BPS RI.

Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan. (2022). Data Kasus Pidana Ringan di Lapas dan Rutan. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.

Gultom, Marwan Effendy. (2012). Kejaksaan RI: Posisi dan Fungsinya dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Hamzah, Andi. (2008). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Komnas HAM. (2021). Laporan Tahunan HAM dan Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Komnas HAM RI.

Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Jakarta. (2022). Laporan Advokasi: Pelanggaran Prosedur dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Ringan.

Mahkamah Agung RI. (2023). Pedoman Penerapan Pidana dalam Kasus Pidana Ringan. Jakarta: MA-RI.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muladi & Arief, Barda Nawawi. (1992). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Nurdin, Asep. (2020). Diversi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Pidana Ringan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Yudisial, 13(1), 45–60.

Nurhayati, Sri. (2019). Penerapan Asas Ultimum Remedium dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 7(2), 134–148.

Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur. (2022). Putusan No. 123/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Tim (Kasus Pencurian Ringan).

Prasetyo, Teguh. (2010). Kriminologi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. (2003). Kriminologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum UI.

Simons, Jan. (2006). Hukum Pidana sebagai Sistem. Jakarta: Refika Aditama.

Soesilo, R. (1996). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana serta Komentar-komentarnya. Jakarta: Politeia.

Sudarto. (1981). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-28

How to Cite

The Role of Criminal Sanctions in Combating Minor Theft Crimes. (2024). Ipso Jure , 1(8), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.62872/04g8rg55

Similar Articles

1-10 of 119

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.