The Antinomy Of Corporate Criminal Law Enforcement In The Environment

Authors

  • Erwin Syahruddin Universitas Bhayangkara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/gcm88z65

Keywords:

Corporations, Environmental Crimes, Law Enforcement

Abstract

A corporation whose business activities are suspected of polluting and damaging the environment and having a major and important impact on the environment. Corporations in carrying out their business activities can cause environmental crimes, one of which is the Lapindo mud case. Article 116 of UUPPLH has regulated law enforcement on environmental criminal cases committed by corporations where criminal charges and criminal sanctions are imposed on business entities and/or people who give orders to commit such criminal acts or people who act as leaders of activities in such criminal acts. This research is a doctrinal legal research, in which this research examines the enforcement of criminal law for corporations that commit environmental crimes with a focus on the Lapindo mud case. The results of this study found that there are several obstacles in law enforcement of the Lapindo mud case, namely in terms of legal factors / laws, law enforcement factors, facilities or facilities, and cultural factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonim, “5 Aksi Pemerintah Jokowi Beli Aset Lapindo & Menyerahnya Bakrie” http://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/5-aksi-pemerintah-jokowi-beli-aset-lapindo-menyerahnya-bakrie.html, diakses tanggal 1 Maret 2023.

Anonim, “MA Tolak Uji Materiil Perpres Lumpur Lapindo” http://www.antaranews.com/berita/94087/ma-tolak-uji-materiil-perpres-lumpur-lapindo, diakses tanggal 1 Maret 2023.

Anonim, “President Calls for Global Commitment to Eradicate Corruption” http://beritadotcom.blogspot.com/2008_06_12_archive.html, diakses tanggal 28 Januari 2023.

M. Daud Silalahi, Hukum Lingkungan dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, Bandung, Alumni, 2001.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja dan Sidharta, B. Arief, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup berlakunya Ilmu Hukum, Bandung, PT Alumni, 2000.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, Hukum, Masyarakat dan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Jakarta, Bina Cipta, 1976.

Ni Nyoman Arif Tri Noviyanti dkk, Tanggung Jawab Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup, Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, Volume 13, Nomor 2, 2019.

P.A.F. Lamintang, Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, Bandung: Armico, 1984.

R. Dwi Kennardi Dewanto P, Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup di Wilayah Hukum Sidoarjo, Program Studi Magister Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga.

Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Presfektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisianisme, Bandung, Binacipta, 1996.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Masyarakat dan Pembangunan, Bandung, Alumni, 1980.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung, Alumni, 1986.

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Stanford Optner, System Analysis for Business Management, Prentice Hall, Inc., New York, 1968, dalam Tatang M. Amirin, Pokok-Pokok Teori Sistem, Jakarta, Rajawali, 1986.

Sudarto, Hukum Pidana I, Badan Penyediaan Bahan-bahan Kuliah FH UNDIP, Semarang, 1987/1988.

Tim Kelompok Kerja (Tim Pokja) Penyusunan Perma Pidana Korporasi, Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Pidana Korporasi, Jakarta, Perpustakaan Nasional RI, 2017.

Tonny Samuel, Penerapan Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Bagi Korporasi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan, Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Volume 8, Nomor 1, 2016.

Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, Lembaran Negara Nomor 140 Tahun 2009, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5059.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-27

How to Cite

The Antinomy Of Corporate Criminal Law Enforcement In The Environment. (2025). Ipso Jure , 1(12), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.62872/gcm88z65

Similar Articles

21-30 of 110

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.