Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient Acceptance in the Cancer Navigation Program at Dr. M. Djamil Padang General Hospital in 2024

Authors

  • Wawan Wahyudi Rumah sakit M D Jamil Padang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/85rabb98

Keywords:

Cancer navigation, Patient acceptance, Family support, Health communication, Indonesia

Abstract

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in Indonesia, posing challenges in access, timely diagnosis, and continuity of care. To address these gaps, RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang implemented a cancer navigation program to guide patients through the treatment process. This study aimed to analyze the factors associated with patient acceptance of the program in 2024. A quantitative cross-sectional design was applied with 100 cancer patients recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a validated structured questionnaire covering socio-demographics, knowledge, family support, healthcare communication, and perceived benefits. Analysis included Chi-square tests and logistic regression with a 95% confidence level. The results showed that 65% of patients accepted the program, while 35% did not. Family support (p=0.001), knowledge level (p=0.021), and healthcare provider communication quality (p=0.004) were significantly associated with acceptance, whereas age, gender, education, and perceived benefits were not. Logistic regression identified family support as the most dominant predictor (OR=3.25), followed by communication quality (OR=2.89) and knowledge (OR=2.10). These findings highlight the importance of social and interpersonal factors in shaping patient engagement. In conclusion, strengthening family involvement, patient education, and communication competencies among healthcare providers is essential to optimize navigation program acceptance, improve continuity of care, and support the national cancer control strategy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adebayo, T., Okonkwo, C., & Abimbola, S. (2020). Patient navigation and cancer care in Africa: A review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05499-5

2. Andriyani, Y., Allenidekania, A., Dewi, G., & Nuraini, T. (2025). The role of navigation in improving the quality of life of cancer patients: A systematic study in Indonesia. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 10(6).

3. Bell, J. G. (2020). Patient navigation effect on cancer patients' quality of life and distress. Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship, 11(10). https://jons-online.com/issues/2020/october-2020-vol-11-no-10/3148-patient-navigation-effect-on-cancer-patients-quality-of-life-and-distress

4. Chan, C., Lee, J., & Wong, K. (2022). Family involvement and cancer care navigation in Malaysia: A qualitative study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 9(3), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2021.12.005

5. Chotipanich, S., et al. (2023). Impact of patient education on cancer navigation uptake in Thailand. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 24(6), 1875–1883. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.6.1875

6. Dasgupta, A., et al. (2020). Family support and treatment adherence among cancer patients in India and Bangladesh. Journal of Global Oncology, 6(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.20.00123

7. Dumont, S., et al. (2021). Communication skills of oncology navigators in Canada: A competency framework. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29(9), 5431–5440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06027-9

8. Freeman, H. P. (2012). The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 21(10), 1614–1617. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0982

9. Garcia, L., Ramos, P., & Santos, A. (2021). Family-oriented interventions and navigation program acceptance in the Philippines. Journal of Cancer Education, 36(5), 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01863-5

10. Globocan. (2024). National Cancer Plan 2024–2034. International Cancer Control Partnership. https://www.iccp-portal.org/sites/default/files/plans/Rencana_Kanker_Nasional_2024-2034.pdf

11. Green, M., et al. (2021). Motivational interviewing in oncology navigation: Enhancing patient engagement. Psycho-Oncology, 30(8), 1264–1272. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5672

12. Implementation Study, RSUP Cipto Mangunkusumo. (2023). Implementation of patient navigation program: Experience in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital as one of the first pilot projects in Indonesia. ResearchGate.

13. Jaganathan, M. (2024). Presentation of breast cancer and impact of patient navigation. ASCO Global Oncology, 10(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.23.00297

14. Johnson, R., et al. (2021). Age-related differences in acceptance of supportive oncology services. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 12(7), 1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2021.01.009

15. Kumar, S., et al. (2022). Tele-navigation for oncology patients in India: Feasibility and acceptance. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 28(5), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211022145

16. Lee, H., & Park, J. (2022). Education level and cancer care participation: A Korean study. Healthcare, 10(3), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030543

17. Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Family support and cancer navigation acceptance in China: A mixed-method study. Cancer Nursing, 44(6), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000856

18. Lwin, M. O., et al. (2021). Educational interventions and cancer program adherence in Southeast Asia. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(7), 1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.021

19. Martinez, A., et al. (2022). Health literacy and navigation program engagement in oncology. Journal of Cancer Policy, 31, 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100302

20. Merck Foundation & American Cancer Society. (2025). Advancing patient-centered cancer care in resource-limited countries. Merck Sustainability Report. https://www.merck.com/company-overview/sustainability/philanthropy/advancing-patient-centered-cancer-care-in-resource-limited-countries/

21. Nguyen, T., et al. (2022). Barriers to patient navigation in Vietnam: A qualitative study. Global Health Action, 15(1), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2112197

22. Nugroho, A., Santoso, B., & Widodo, T. (2023). Family involvement and adherence in Indonesian cancer patients. Indonesian Journal of Cancer, 17(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.33371/ijoc.2023.17.2.121

23. O’Brien, M., et al. (2022). Patient navigator competencies in oncology: Australian perspective. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00797-5

24. Park, E., & Hwang, J. (2020). Family involvement and psychological resilience in Korean cancer patients. Asian Oncology Nursing, 20(4), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1188/aon.2020.287-295

25. Peterson, G., et al. (2022). Socioeconomic predictors of navigation acceptance in the U.S. Cancer Epidemiology, 77, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2022.102123

26. Rahman, F., et al. (2022). Knowledge gaps in Indonesian cancer patients: Implications for navigation programs. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional, 17(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v17i1.4520

27. Ratnawati, I., Nuraini, T., Hargiana, G., & Gayatri, D. (2025). Patient navigator services for improving quality of care, treatment access, and holistic empowerment. Forikes e-Journal, 16(1).

28. Rikumahu, M., Allenidekania, A., Pujasari, H., & Gayatri, D. (2025). Effectiveness of cancer patient navigator program to reduce caregiver burden: A systematic review. Jurnal Kesehatan Vokasional, 10(2).

29. Rodriguez, M., et al. (2021). Patient navigation in oncology: Reducing disparities and improving outcomes. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21655

30. Siregar, N. K., & Mulyono, S. (2023). Effectiveness of telenursing-based patient navigation for lung cancer patients: A literature review. Holistik Jurnal Kesehatan, 17(7).

31. Suryani, F., et al. (2022). Readiness for designing a cancer patient navigation system at Dharmais Cancer Hospital. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan, 25(4).

32. World Health Organization. (2023). Patient navigation and integrated cancer control: Global perspectives. WHO Technical Report Series.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-28

How to Cite

Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient Acceptance in the Cancer Navigation Program at Dr. M. Djamil Padang General Hospital in 2024. (2025). Oshada, 2(4), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.62872/85rabb98

Similar Articles

51-60 of 133

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.