Uang Panai And Its Legality: When Tradition Intersects With Civil Law

Authors

  • Rizky Wisudawan Katjong Universitas Muhammadiyah Papua Author
  • Revie Kurnia Katjong Universitas Yapis Papua Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/n2tq2002

Keywords:

Adat Law, civil law, legal practice, marriage custom, uang panai

Abstract

This study examines the legal position of uang panai, a traditional form of payment in Bugis-Makassar marriage customs, within Indonesia’s civil law system. The practice, deeply rooted in local culture, symbolizes respect, social status, and familial honor. However, its contemporary implementation often intersects with the formal legal order, raising questions regarding its classification as a lawful civil contract, a conditional gift, or an adat-based moral obligation. Using a normative juridical approach, this article analyzes relevant provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), the 1945 Constitution, and Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, alongside empirical findings from legal and sociological studies. The results show that while uang panai fulfills the elements of a binding agreement under Article 1320 of the Civil Code, its absence of written documentation and inconsistent enforcement create legal uncertainty. The state’s constitutional recognition of customary law under Article 18B(2) of the Constitution remains largely declarative rather than substantive. Consequently, disputes involving uang panai are often settled through informal adat forums without enforceable legal authority. To harmonize tradition and modern law, this research recommends the formulation of local regulations (peraturan daerah) and the development of judicial precedents that establish fair, proportional, and gender-sensitive standards for customary contracts. Such legal integration would ensure that uang panai remains a respected cultural practice while achieving the legal certainty and justice mandated by Indonesia’s civil law framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Asshiddiqie, J. (2014). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

2. Badrulzaman, M. D. (1993). Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.

3. Bedner, A., & Van Huis, S. (2018). Pluralism and Legal Recognition of Customary Law in Indonesia. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 277–301.

4. Fadli, M., & Syamsuddin, M. (2019). Tradisi Uang Panai dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat Bugis-Makassar. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, 4(2), 165–180.

5. Fauzi, M. (2016). Dinamika Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkawinan di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(4), 611–629.

6. Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24(1), 1–55.

7. Himonga, C., & Moore, E. (2015). Reform of Customary Marriage Law in South Africa. Journal of African Law, 59(2), 258–283.

8. Hooker, M. B. (1978). Adat Law in Modern Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

9. Ikbal, M. (2016). Uang Panai dalam Perspektif Sosio-Legal di Masyarakat Bugis Makassar. Jurnal Al-Daulah, 5(1), 23–35.

10. Irianto, S. (2020). Pluralisme Hukum dan Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

11. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2012). Putusan Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 tentang Hutan Adat. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

12. Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

13. Mahmud, A. (2022). Kajian Yuridis terhadap Perikatan Berdasarkan Adat dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Yustitia, 8(2), 45–59.

14. Putri, N., & Rahman, F. (2020). Hukum Adat dan Pluralisme Hukum di Indonesia: Analisis Pengakuan dan Implementasi. Mimbar Hukum, 32(1), 45–63.

15. Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa.

16. Rahardjo, S. (2012). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

17. Rahim, A., Syamsuddin, A., & Sari, N. (2020). Tradisi Uang Panai dalam Perspektif Nilai Sosial dan Moral Masyarakat Bugis Makassar. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 14(2), 241–260.

18. Sahriani, R., & Yusri, A. (2021). Persepsi Gender terhadap Tradisi Uang Panai di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Al-Qalam, 27(1), 95–107.

19. Setiadi, W. (2020). Asas Keadilan dan Kepatutan dalam Hukum Perikatan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(1), 65–82.

20. Subekti. (2019). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.

21. Syamsuddin, A., & Sari, N. (2020). Dimensi Ekonomi dan Sosial Tradisi Uang Panai di Masyarakat Makassar. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Islam, 9(1), 89–105.

22. Utrecht, E. (1962). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoever

Downloads

Published

2025-10-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Uang Panai And Its Legality: When Tradition Intersects With Civil Law. (2025). Leges Privatae, 2(3), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.62872/n2tq2002

Similar Articles

1-10 of 42

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.