Civil Legal Protection Against Patients For Chatbot-Based Health Consultation Malpractice

Authors

  • Andi Hartawati Universitas Bandar Lampung Author
  • A. Silfiana Sirajuddin Universitas Andi Sudirman Author
  • MUHAMMAD SUMARDIN Universitas Andi Sudirman Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/mf1q9747

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Health Law, Malpractice, Patient Protection

Abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in the healthcare sector has significantly transformed medical consultation practices, particularly through the use of AI chatbots as tools for preliminary diagnosis and health recommendations. However, the use of such systems introduces potential algorithmic errors and biases that may cause harm to patients, while the existing legal framework has not yet clearly defined the scope of civil liability in cases of AI-based malpractice. This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to examine civil legal protection for patients harmed by AI-driven medical consultations. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s Health Law, Consumer Protection Law, and Electronic Information and Transactions Law remain insufficient to address the complex distribution of liability among doctors, healthcare institutions, platform providers, and AI developers. Therefore, regulatory reform in the form of a lex specialis is necessary to incorporate the principles of explainability, mandatory algorithm auditing, and burden-shifting mechanisms to ensure equitable legal protection for patients in the digital era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvina, M., Markoni, A., & Kanthika, R. (2025). Legal protection of patients and responsibilities of artificial intelligence–based telemedicine health services in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 12(1), 45–60.

Bertolini, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and liability: Challenges and opportunities for the healthcare sector. European Journal of Health Law, 27(3), 221–244.

Carey, A. (2024). Malpractice concerns impact physician decisions to consult AI. Johns Hopkins Carey Business School Research Review, 16(2), 73–85.

Cestonaro, A. (2023). Liability in AI-assisted medical decision-making: Emerging standards and future directions. Health Policy and Technology, 12(4), 100768.

Di Mauro, D., Shah, R., & Choi, S. (2025). AI and diagnostic accuracy in healthcare: Comparative analysis of human-AI collaboration. Journal of Medical Systems, 49(2), 155–172.

Duffourc, N. (2024). Decoding U.S. tort liability in healthcare’s black-box AI era. Journal of Law and Biosciences, 11(1), 1–25.

Fernandez Llorca, D., et al. (2022). Liability regimes in the age of AI: A use-case driven analysis of the burden of proof. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, 105731.

Gumilar, A.W., Sihombing, R., & Pratama, D. (2024). Ethical and legal implications of AI-generated medical advice in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Etika Medis, 9(2), 101–118.

Hakim, R. (2023). Kepastian hukum dalam inovasi kesehatan digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(3), 233–247.

Hart, H. L. A. (2020). The concept of law (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Jostard, E. (2020). AI and the boundaries of medical malpractice law. Journal of Health Law and Policy, 45(3), 309–333.

Kania, D., & Rahmawati, L. (2023). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam pengembangan hukum digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15–27.

Li, S., Kim, J., & O’Connor, M. (2023). AI chatbots in digital health: Opportunities, risks, and regulatory challenges. Digital Health, 9(1), 1–13.

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Milbank Quarterly. (2024). Artificial intelligence and liability in medicine: Balancing safety and innovation. Milbank Quarterly, 102(2), 320–345.

Meyrowitsch, D., Petersen, K., & Lind, A. (2023). Bias and misinformation in medical chatbots: Implications for clinical safety. BMC Medical Ethics, 24(1), 71–84.

Price, J. (2024). The EU Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive and implications for healthcare law. European Law Journal, 30(1), 58–77.

Prosser, W. (2019). Law of torts (5th ed.). New York: Foundation Press.

Terranova, G., Bertolini, A., & Wei, Z. (2024). AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare: The role of expert witnesses. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1337335.

Wei, Z., Verona, R., Bertolini, A., & Mengaldo, L. (2025). Explainability matters: The effect of liability rules on the healthcare sector. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 33(1), 77–99.

Yuliana, S. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban hukum tenaga medis dalam layanan berbasis kecerdasan buatan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(2), 211–230.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Civil Legal Protection Against Patients For Chatbot-Based Health Consultation Malpractice. (2025). Leges Privatae, 2(3), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.62872/mf1q9747

Similar Articles

31-40 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.