Settlement of civil disputes through mediation: its effectiveness and challenge in the District Court

Authors

  • Henny Saida Flora Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Author
  • Andi Hartawati Universitas Andi sudirman Author
  • Sachsyabillah Dwi Maharani Yusuf Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/1c8z3q82

Keywords:

Mediation, Dispute Resolution, Civil Law, Effectiveness, District Court

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of mediation in resolving civil disputes and to identify various challenges faced at the District Court of Bandung. The approach used is normative-empirical juridical, combining analysis of the prevailing legal provisions particularly Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2016 with empirical data obtained through interviews, observations, and document studies of civil cases undergoing mediation. The findings indicate that although mediation has been normatively integrated into the civil justice system, its effectiveness remains low. The main obstacles include the public's low legal awareness regarding the benefits of mediation, the limited number and competence of judge-mediators, and the lack of facilities and institutional support. Furthermore, mediation is often perceived merely as an administrative obligation rather than a substantive dispute resolution mechanism. Therefore, regulatory reform, continuous mediator training, and intensive public education are needed to make mediation a more effective, efficient, and equitable alternative for dispute resolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, S. F. (2019). Civil mediation reform: Balancing the scales of procedural and substantive justice. Civil Justice Quarterly, 38.

Allen, T. (2019). Mediation law and civil practice.

Amarini, I. (2021). Court Connected Mediation: Civil Dispute with A Local Society Cultural Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 20(1), 256-273.

Arshad, S. A., & Saleem, H. A. R. (2025). Integration of Alternate Dispute Resolution as a Complement to the Traditional Court System in Pakistan. Research Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 112-125.

Bhatti, M. U., & Rizwan, M. S. (2023). Alternative dispute resolution in criminal justice system: a case study of the Punjab ADR act 2019. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5(01), 181-195.

Cashman, P., & Ginnivan, E. (2019). Digital justice: Online resolution of minor civil disputes and the use of digital technology in complex litigation and class actions. Macquarie LJ, 19, 39.

Churad, P. K. (2024). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Types, Benefits and Drawback. Issue 3 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 7, 951.

Cortés, P. (2023). Embedding alternative dispute resolution in the civil justice system: a taxonomy for ADR referrals and a digital pathway to increase the uptake of ADR. Legal Studies, 43(2), 312-330.

Darlen, K. (2019). The efficacy of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution Mechanism: a critique.

Ferreira, D. B., & Severo, L. (2021). Multiparty Mediation as Solution for Urban Conflicts: A Case Analysis from Brazil. BRICS Law Journal, 8(3), 5-29.

Gautam, R., Kulshrestha, P., & Goswami, M. A. K. (2021). Mediation and family dispute resolution mechanism: A case study on clinical legal education. Elementary Education Online, 20(3), 2490-2490.

Hansen, S. (2019). Challenging arbitral awards in the construction industry: Case study of infrastructure disputes. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(1), 06518004.

Haq, H. S., Budiono, A., & Hangabei, S. M. (2021). Management of national judicial system control based on local laws: A case study at the mediation center in Lombok, Indonesia. Lex Localis, 19(3), 485-501.

Hodges, C. (2019). Delivering Dispute Resolution.

Ibrahim, A. S., Abubakari, M., Akanbang, B. A., & Kepe, T. (2022). Resolving land conflicts through alternative dispute resolution: Exploring the motivations and challenges in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 120, 106272.

Illankoon, I. M. C. S., Tam, V. W., Le, K. N., & Ranadewa, K. A. T. O. (2022). Causes of disputes, factors affecting dispute resolution and effective alternative dispute resolution for Sri Lankan construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(2), 218-228.

Kathryn, M., Amini, T., Kalijunjung, K., Pitriani, P., & Lubis, A. F. (2024). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mediation as an Alternative for Civil Dispute Resolution: Quantitative Research in District Courts. Rechtsnormen Journal of Law, 2(2), 166-176.

Lindsay, G., Conlon, G., Totsika, V., Gray, G., & Cullen, M. A. (2021). The impact of mediation on resolution of disagreements around special educational needs: effectiveness and cost effectiveness. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 275-298.

Marlina, A. (2020). Penal Mediation As Alternative Dispute Resolution In Parepare. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 3(1), 30-50.

Patoari, M. M. H., Nor, A. H. M., Awang, M. N. B., Chowdhury, A. H., & Talukder, J. (2020). Legal and administrative challenges of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a peaceful means of resolving the land dispute in the rural areas of Bangladesh. Beijing L. Rev., 11, 415.

Poitras, K., Birnbaum, R., Saini, M., Bala, N., & Cyr, F. (2021). Family dispute resolution: Characteristics of cases resolved by trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 123, 105832.

Prince, S. (2020). Encouragement of mediation in England and Wales has been futile: is there now a role for online dispute resolution in settling low-value claims?. International journal of law in context, 16(2), 181-196.

Prytyka, Y., Izarova, I., & Kravtsov, S. (2020). Towards effective dispute resolution: A long way of mediation development in Ukraine. Asia Life Sciences, 29(1), 389-399.

Quek Anderson, D. (2019). The convergence of ADR and ODR within the courts: the impact on access to justice. Civil Justice Quarterly, 38(1), 126.

Schmitz, A. J. (2019). Expanding access to remedies through e-court initiatives. Buff. L. Rev., 67, 89.

Shahzad, K., & Ali, A. (2023). Access to justice: a critical analysis of khyber pakhtunkhwa alternate dispute resolution act 2020. Pakistan journal of social research, 5(02), 1288-1295.

Tan, V. (2019). Online dispute resolution for small civil claims in Victoria: A new paradigm in civil justice. Deakin Law Review, 24, 101-138.

Taufik, A. (2021). The settlement principles and effectiveness of divorce by mediation of islamic civil perspective: A critical review of the supreme court regulation. Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial, 18(1), 168-188.

Uzougbo, N. S., Akagha, O. V., Coker, J. O., Bakare, S. S., & Ijiga, A. C. (2023). Effective strategies for resolving labour disputes in the corporate sector: Lessons from Nigeria and the United States. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 3(2), 418-424.

Welsh, N. A. (2019). Bringing transparency and accountability (with a dash of competition) to Court-Connected dispute resolution. Fordham L. Rev., 88, 2449.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Settlement of civil disputes through mediation: its effectiveness and challenge in the District Court. (2025). Leges Privatae, 2(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.62872/1c8z3q82

Similar Articles

1-10 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.