Restructuring Indonesia’s Directorate General of Intellectual Property Into an Autonomous Agency to Strengthen Valuation Function and Economic Utilization of Intellectual Property in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/rras5s13Keywords:
intellectual property, governance, institutional reform, restructuring, autonomous body, IP office, valuationAbstract
This research examines the urgency of restructuring the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) into an autonomous body to strengthen the valuation functions and optimize the economic utilization of intellectual property in Indonesia. Intellectual Property (IP) plays a strategic role in driving innovation and knowledge-based economic growth. However, IP governance in Indonesia continues to face challenges, including weak institutional capacity, low commercialization rates of innovation outputs, and an inefficient valuation system. The Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP), as the national authority responsible for IP protection and administration, currently lacks an adequate institutional structure to address these challenges optimally. This study examines three main issues: (1) the characteristics of current IP governance in Indonesia and its challenges in valuation and economic utilization; (2) the effectiveness of DGIP’s institutional framework in supporting IP valuation and commercialization; and (3) an ideal institutional restructuring model to transform DGIP into an autonomous body. The research combines normative juridical approaches, qualitative data analysis, and comparative studies of IP institutional models in South Korea, Japan, the United States, the European Union, China, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. Findings reveal that DGIP’s current administrative and bureaucratic structure limits flexibility in resource management, innovation ecosystem development, and IP commercialization. The study recommends restructuring DGIP into a Public Service Agency (PSA the Indonesian term being Badan Layanan Umum) to strengthen valuation functions and optimize the economic utilization of IP. This model is expected to enhance public service efficiency, encourage private sector engagement, and foster cross-sectoral synergy in developing a knowledge-based economy.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business, 2012.
Ahmad, T., and M. Sulistyaningsih. Potensi Ekonomi Kekayaan Intelektual. Bandung: Penerbit Universitas, 2023.
Anson, W., and D. C. দূরেs. Fundamentals of Intellectual Property Valuation: A Primer for Identifying and Determining Value. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2005.
Asmoro, A. Administrasi Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia: Analisis dan Solusi. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas, 2022.
Bachtiar. Politik Hukum Konstitusi Pertanggung Jawaban Konstitusional Presiden. Jakarta: Suluh Media, 2018.
Correa, C. Integrating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries. Swiss: The South Centre, 2000.
Damodaran, A. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Djokosutono. Kuliah Ilmu Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1982.
Friedman, L. M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation, 2017.
Ganea, P., and Pattloch. Intellectual Property Law in China. Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law: Kluwer Law International, 2005.
Hadjon, P. M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat - Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum Dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.
Hassan, E., O. Yaqub, and S. Diepeveen. Intellectual Property and Developing Countries: A review of the literature. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010.
Heller, M. A., and M. Cohn. Design Rights and the Creative Economy. London: Routledge, 2021.
International Accounting Standards Board. International Financial Reporting Standards. London: IFRS Foundation, 2023.
Jaffe, A. B., and J. Lerner. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press, 2004.
Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1986.
Keller, K. L. Strategic Brand Management. New York: Wiley, 2022.
Kretschmer, M., and L. Bently. Intellectual Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Marzuki, P. M. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Merges, R. P., P. S. Menell, and M. A. Lemley. Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age. 7th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.
Muhtaj, M. E. Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konstitusi Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.
Munawir, H. Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2015.
North, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Olwan, R. M. Intellectual Property and Development. Springer eBooks, 2013.
Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications, 2014.
Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - Into the Age of Austerity. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 2017.
Pratt, S. P. Valuing a Business: The Analysis and Appraisal of Closely Held Companies. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Pusat Kajian Ekonomi Kekayaan Intelektual. Studi Regulasi dan Kelembagaan Valuasi KI di Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 2024.
Raharjo, S. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Scott, W. R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Sage Publications, 2014.
Setiono. Rule Of Law (supremasi hukum). Surakarta: Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2004.
Sibuea, H. P. Ilmu Negara. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2014.
Smith, G. V., and R. L. Parr. Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
Supriyanto, A. Valuasi Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2017.
Suryadi, A. Peran Badan Otonomi dalam Penegakan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Akademik, 2022.
Yamin, M. Proklamasi dan Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1982.
Yin, R. K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
Book Chapters
Arrow, K. J. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, 609–26. Princeton University Press, 1962.
Deere, Carolyn. “The Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries: The Relevance of the World Intellectual Property Organization.” In The Development Agenda: Global Intellectual Property and Developing Countries, edited by N. W. Netanel. New York: Oxford Academic, 2009.
Phan, K. “Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in Vietnam: Opportunities and Challenges.” In Challenges of Governance, 13. 2021.
Santa Cruz, M., and C. Olivos. “The Twenty-First Century Intellectual Property Office.” In Intellectual Property and Development: Understanding the Interfaces, edited by C. Correa and X. Seuba, 182. Singapore: Springer, 2019.
Journals and Research Articles
Alcácer, J., K. Beukel, and Cassiman. “Capturing Value from Intellectual Property (IP) in a Global Environment.” Journal of International Business Studies, 2017.
Ardiansyah, E., R. Rachman, S. Datupalinge, and D. K. Sari. “The Role and Authority of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property in Handling Complaints of Copyright Infringement in Indonesia.” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal 8 (2023).
Barbosa, A. F., F. P. Velloso, and J. Bastos. “Do surgimento ao ocaso da anuência prévia da Anvisa: uma análise crítica do patenteamento farmacêutico no Brasil.” Revista Digital de Direito Administrativo, 2024, 334.
Barbosa, D. B. “Technology Contracts in Brazil: The Patent Office Screening Rôle,” 2012, 5.
Bowen, G. A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27–40.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77–101.
Brignall, S., and S. Modell. “An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the ‘New Public Sector’.” Management Accounting Research 11 (2000): 281–306.
Darwance, D., Y. Yokotani, and W. Anggita. “Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 14, no. 22 (2020): 193–208.
Dewi, P., and F. Anwar. “Strategi Pemanfaatan Kekayaan Intelektual: Peluang dan Tantangan.” Jurnal Ekonomi Kreatif 13, no. 4 (2023): 45–60.
Drahos, P. “Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 5, no. 5 (2002): 765–89.
Fitriani, N., and L. Indriani. “Koordinasi Lembaga Pengelola Kekayaan Intelektual: Studi Kasus dan Best Practices.” Jurnal Kebijakan Publik 11, no. 3 (2021): 102–19.
Gorian, E. “Singapore state strategy on development of intellectual property: normative-legal and institutional aspects,” 2020, 10–21.
Greenwood, R., and C. R. Hinings. “Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism.” Academy of Management Review 21, no. 4 (1996): 1022–54.
Gurgur, T., and W. Xiong. “Institutional Reforms, Productivity and Efficiency: From Measurement to Implementation.” The World Bank Economic Review 35, no. 3 (2021): 643–62.
Hakim, A. “Dinamika Pelaksanaan Good Governance di Indonesia (dalam Perspektif Yuridis dan Implementasi).” Civil Service 10, no. 1 (2016): 15–33.
Hood, C. “The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 46, no. 1–2 (2021): 93–109.
Kalmyrza, G. M., and G. T. Alaeva. “Issues of legal protection of intellectual property rights.” Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law, 2024, 15.
Kim, J. H. “Intellectual Property Reform in South Korea: Effects on Innovation and Economic Growth.” Journal of East Asian Studies 12, no. 3 (2015): 245–67.
Kitch, E. W. “The Nature and Function of the Patent System.” The Journal of Law and Economics 20, no. 2 (1977): 265–90.
Kshetri, N. “Institutionalization of Intellectual Property Rights in China.” European Management Journal 27 (2009): 155–64.
Landes, W. M., and R. A. Posner. “An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law.” The Journal of Legal Studies 18, no. 2 (1989): 325–63.
Lee, M., J. D. Alba, and D. Park. “Intellectual Property Rights, Informal Economy, and FDI into Developing Countries.” ADB Working Paper, 2018, 15.
Lozova, G., and I. P. Bagriy. “Reforming the Intellectual Property System of Ukraine in the Context of European Integration.” Theoretical and Applied Issues of Economics, 2024.
Magalhães, G. R. F., and R. L. Sichel. “A Burocracia nos Contratos de Averbação de Tecnologia no Brasil,” 2020, 153–67.
Mangar, I., and M. R. Rosyid. “Lembaga Independen Negara dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Definisi: Jurnal Agama dan Sosial-Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2022): 75–84.
May, R., and S. L. Cooper. “Intellectual Property Rights Under the Constitution’s Rule of Law.” Perspectives from FSF Scholars 9, no. 31 (2014): 4.
Meyer, J., and B. Rowan. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (1977): 340–63.
Muis, L. S. “Hak Atas Aksesibilitas Obat Paten Bagi Masyarakat.” Widya Pranata Hukum Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 36–64.
Natalia, A. “Paradigma Good Governance Dalam Administrasi Publik Memfasilitasi Pencapaian Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (TBP).” Jurnal Tapis: Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam 17, no. 1 (2021): 15–26.
Papageorgiadis, N., F. McDonald, C. Wang, and P. Konara. “The characteristics of intellectual property rights regimes: How formal and informal institutions affect outward FDI location.” International Business Review, 2020, 7.
Park, J. H. “Comparative Analysis of IP Valuation Systems in ASEAN Countries.” Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 28, no. 3 (2023): 145–60.
Pratama, A., and R. Kusuma. “Efisiensi Administrasi dalam Pengelolaan Kekayaan Intelektual: Studi Kasus dan Rekomendasi.” Jurnal Administrasi Negara 19, no. 1 (2022): 12–28.
Putri, R. Z. “Eksistensi HAKI di Indonesia pada Era Disrupsi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 2023, 456–58.
Rastogi, M., V. Rastogi, and D. Rajpoot. “Intellectual Property Challenges in Cross-border Business Transations.” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2024.
Reichman, J. H., and R. C. Dreyfuss. “Harmonization Without Consensus: Critical Reflections on Drafting a Substantive Patent Law Treaty.” Duke Law Journal 57, no. 1 (2007): 85–130.
Romer, P. M. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5 (1990): S71–S102.
Saputra, J. I., M. F. Rizki, and Iskandar. “Perspektif Negara Hukum Dalam Pengimplementasian Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.” Jurnal Renvoi: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah 1, no. 2 (2024): 122–23.
Sari, S., and R. Wijaya. “Penegakan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Solusi.” Jurnal Hukum Indonesia 15, no. 2 (2021): 85–102.
Saydakhmedov, U. M. “Issues of Organizational and Legal Support for the Protection of Intellectual Property in Administrative Courts.” The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 2024, 21.
Setianingrum, R. B. “Evaluasi Regulasi Valuasi Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia: Perspektif Komparatif.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 41, no. 2 (2022): 78–92.
Sitepu, V. “Pelaksanaan Prinsip First To File dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Dagang Asing di Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Tentang Gugatan Pencabutan Hak Merek ‘Toast Box’ oleh Breadtalk Pte.ltd No: 02/merek/2011/pn.niaga/medan),” 2015, 3.
Sivova, T. “Intellectual Property Protection in Ukraine and the EU.” Odessa National University Herald. Economy, 2021, 90.
Snyder, D. C. “Locke on Natural Law and Property Rights.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 4 (1986): 723–50.
Tan, C. L., and A. Nugroho. “IP-Backed Financing in Southeast Asia: Challenges and Opportunities.” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, 89–107.
Verhoest, K., B. G. Peters, G. Bouckaert, and B. Verschuere. “The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual Review.” Public Administration and Development 24, no. 2 (2004): 101–18.
Wulandari, Suartini, F. F. “Valuasi Aset Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Jaminan Fidusia.” Binamulia Hukum 13, no. 2 (2024).
Zuhad, Z. M. “Analisis Kepegawaian Lembaga Negara Independen Dalam Menunjang Good Governance (Studi Kasus Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi).” Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik: Res Publica 7, no. 3 (2023).
Reports and Official Documents
China National Intellectual Property Administration. White Paper on Intellectual Property Protection in China 2020. Beijing, 2020.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DGIP). Laporan Tahunan 2022. 2022.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DGIP). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah DGIP Tahun 2023. 2023.
DPMA. DPMA Annual Review. 2022.
Egypt National Intellectual Property Strategy. Executive Summary. 2022.
Egyptian Authority for Intellectual Property. EAIP Annual Report 2023. 2023.
Egyptian Authority for Intellectual Property. International Cooperation Programme 2023. 2023.
European Patent Office. Annual Report. 2023.
European Patent Office. Patent Statistics Report 2023. 2023.
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). Intellectual Property Perception Study. Alicante: EUIPO, 2020.
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). IP Financing and Commercialisation Report. Singapore: IPOS, 2021.
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore. IPOS Annual Report 2023. 2023.
IP Australia. Trade Marks. Canberra: IP Australia, 2021.
Japan Patent Office. Intellectual Property Strategic Program 2004 as of May 2004. Tokyo, 2004.
Japan Patent Office. JPO Status Report 2022. 2022.
Japan Patent Office. JPO Status Report 2024. 2024.
Jang, J. WIPO Solutions for IP Offices. 2017.
JPO. Intellectual Property Strategy Headquarters, Comparison of IP Valuation Systems Worldwide. 2022.
Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Laporan Tahunan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual 2023. 2023.
Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). KIPO Annual Report 2018. Seoul, 2018.
Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). National Intellectual Property Strategy Annual Implementation Report. Seoul: KIPO, 2021.
Korean Intellectual Property Office. KIPO Annual Report 2022. 2022.
Korean Intellectual Property Office. Annual Report 2023. Seoul: KIPO Publications, 2023.
Nagaoka, S. Hitotsubashi University, 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and Tha United States: Lesson from a Decade of Change. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.
Ogada, T. P. M., and World Intellectual Property Organization. Methodology for the Development of National Intellectual Property Strategies, Toolkit 3: Benchmarking Indicators. 2016.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2023 Tentang Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia. 2023.
Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property. Annual Report 2023. 2023.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Fiscal Year 2021: Congressional Justification. 2020.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. FY 2023 Performance and Accountability Report. 2023.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patents: How They Work. Washington, D.C.: USPTO, 2023.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. USPTO Outreach Programs Overview. 2023.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. USPTO Public Engagement Policies and Procedures Manual. 2023.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. 2nd ed. Geneva: WIPO, 2004.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The Evolution of Modern Patent Systems. WIPO Publications, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Module 11: IP Valuation, IP Panorama. 2016.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Methodology for the Development of National Intellectual Property Strategies. Geneva: WIPO, 2019.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Geneva: WIPO, 2020.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Case Study: Singapore’s IPOS as a Strategic IP Agency. 2021.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders. 2021.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). World Intellectual Property Report. 2021.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Report on the International IP System and Office Cooperation. Geneva: WIPO, 2022.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The Role of IP Offices in the Innovation Ecosystem. Tbilisi, 2022.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO Performance Report 2022/2023. 2022.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). An International Guide to Patent Case Management for Judges. WIPO, 2023.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Indonesia Intellectual Property Statistics Country Profile. 2023.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Guide. 2023.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO Publication 2000-2023. 2023.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO Statistics Database. 2023.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Models of Intellectual Property Governance and Administration. Geneva: WIPO, 2024.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Autonomy and Governance of National IP Offices. Geneva, 2021.
Online News and Websites
Candra, A. “Mengapa Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Perlu Dilindungi?” Kompasiana, October 31, 2010. https://www.kompasiana.com/aguscandra/55003caea33311d07550fe0b/mengapa-hak-kekayaan-intelektual-hki-perlu-dilindungi.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. “Direktorat Penegakan Hukum DGIP Siapkan Langkah Strategis Hadapi Tantangan Digital di Tahun 2025.” January 27, 2025. https://www.dgip.go.id/index.php/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/direktorat-penegakan-hukum-DGIP-siapkan-langkah-strategis-hadapi-tantangan-digital-di-tahun-2025?kategori=liputan-humas.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. “Penegakan Hukum KI di Indonesia: Upaya dan Pencapaian DGIP.” January 27, 2025. https://dgip.go.id/index.php/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/penegakan-hukum-ki-di-indonesia-upaya-dan-pencapaian-DGIP.
European External Action Service. “Sekilas Uni Eropa.” Accessed 2024. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/.
Jose, T. “What is TRIPs Plus? What is Data Exclusivity?” Indian Economy, March 11, 2017. https://www.indianeconomy.net/splclassroom/what-is-trips-plus-what-is-data-exclusivity/.
Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia. “Sejarah DGIP.” Accessed n.d. https://www.dgip.go.id/tentang-DGIP/sejarah-DGIP.
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian. “Industri Kreatif dan Digital: Kembangkan Potensi, Gerakkan Ekonomi, dan Ciptakan Lapangan Kerja.” Accessed 2025. https://www.ekon.go.id/unduh/info_sektoral/324/berita-industri-kreatif-dan-digital-kembangkan-potensi-gerakkan-ekonomi-dan-ciptakan-lapangan-kerja.
Konstitusi dan Konstitualisme. “Pembatasan Kekuasaan Organ-Organ Eksekutif Independen.” Accessed n.d. https://text-id.123dok.com/document/6qmrnpv7y-pembatasan-kekuasaan-organ-organ-eksekutif-independen.html.
Lepoer, B. L., ed. Singapore: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1989. https://countrystudies.us/singapore/47.htm.
Mariani, and I. Rilyansyah. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Folklor Dalam Instrumen Hukum Internasional dan Impelementasinya di Indonesia.” May 27, 2013. https://mariani-irnirilyansyah.blogspot.com/2013/05/perlindungan-hukum-atas-folklor-dalam_27.html.
SAIP. “Application Grant Date.” Accessed 2025. https://www.saip.gov.sa/.
Satriana, E. “Analisa Konsep Keadilan, Kepastian dan Kemanfaatan dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pertambangan.” July 4, 2020. https://www.kejari-bone.go.id/artikel/detail/1/analisa-konsep-keadilan-kepastian-dan-kemanfaatan-dalam-penegakan-hukum-tindak-pidana-pertambangan.html.
“Teori Negara Hukum.” Accessed n.d. Universitas Islam Indonesia. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/1751/05.2%20bab%202.pdf?sequence=9.
Trisno. “Teori Hukum HAKI.” Academia.edu, September 19, 2017. https://www.academia.edu/15289152/TEORI_HUKUM_HAKI.
Ukrainian National Office for Intellectual Property and Innovations (UANIPIO). Accessed n.d. https://nipo.gov.ua/en/.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office. Accessed 2024. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/intellectual-property-office.
U.S. International Trade Administration. “SAIP Information.” Accessed 2024. https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/saudi-arabia-intellectual-property-agency.
Wicaksono, I. “Politik Hukum Peindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia Pasca di Ratifikasinya TRIPS Agrement.” 2019.
World Bank. “Charges for the use of intellectual property dan GDP (current US$) – Indonesia.” Accessed March 25, 2025. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.GSR.ROYL.CD?contextual=default&locations=ID&name_desc=true.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Insan Kamil (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
