The Existence Of Customary Institutions In Resolution Of Social Conflict In Indonesian Multicultural Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/m1gz5509Keywords:
Customary Institutions, Social Conflict, Multicultural Society, Restorative Justice, Legal PluralismAbstract
Indonesia is a country with a very high level of ethnic, religious, racial, and inter-group diversity, so that the potential for social conflict is always inherent in the dynamics of everyday social life. Amidst the limited reach, costs, and responsiveness of formal justice institutions, customary institutions continue to exist and play a strategic role as conflict resolution mechanisms based on deliberation, kinship, and local wisdom. This article aims to examine the existence, legal status, and effectiveness of customary institutions in resolving social conflicts in Indonesia's multicultural society, while also identifying the challenges they face in the contemporary era. This research uses a normative juridical method combined with an empirical juridical approach, by analyzing laws and regulations, court decisions, and various literature studies on customary conflict resolution practices in several regions in Indonesia. The results of the study indicate that customary institutions have a strong constitutional basis through Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution and in practice are able to resolve conflicts more quickly, cheaply, and oriented towards restoring social relations (restorative), compared to formal justice processes that are adversarial in nature. However, the existence of customary institutions still faces challenges in the form of overlapping regulations, weak formal recognition in some regions, and shifting values due to modernization and digitalization. This article recommends strengthening derivative regulations, harmonizing customary law with national law, and revitalizing customary institutions as an integral part of a pluralistic national dispute resolution system
Downloads
References
Alvindo, M. D., & Hasan, Z. (2025). Peranan lembaga perwatin adat dalam penyelesaian perkara konflik sosial masyarakat di Lampung.
Arisjulyanto, D. (2024). The role of customary law in maintaining social harmony in Indonesian village communities. Journal of Social and Education Research, 2(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.63265/jser.v2i1.139
Arsal, T., Setyowati, D. L., & Hardati, P. (2023). The inheritance of local wisdom for maintaining peace in multicultural society. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 15(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-01-2022-0673
Asmara, T., & Noho, M. D. H. (2022). Religion and cosmopolitan society: religious conflict settlement based on legal culture. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v14.i3.8166
Fatinah, A. P. (2024). Interaksi antara hukum formal dan hukum adat di Indonesia. Legal System Journal, 1(2), 34–41.
Hadi, F. (2022). Negara hukum dan hak asasi di Indonesia. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 1(2).
Hadi, S., et al. (2024). Penyelesaian sengketa tanah ulayat masyarakat hukum adat Suku Ngalum dengan pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Pegunungan Bintang. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(11).
Hutabarat, D., & Pangaribuan, C. S. (2026). Revitalisasi hukum adat melalui pendekatan restorative justice terhadap kriminalisasi modern di Indonesia. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 7.
Ismail, D. E., Mantali, A. R. Y., & Moha, M. R. (2023). The concept of revitalizing traditional institutions in the criminal law system to realize restorative justice. Jambura Law Review, 5(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i2.11682
Khilmi, D. A. K., Findy, R. A., Isviana, P. S., & Radianto, D. O. (2024). Multikulturalisme dalam kehidupan sosial masyarakat Indonesia. Journal Sains Student Research, 2(2), 167–172.
Lubis, A. F. (2022). Digitalisasi dan hukum adat: Pemanfaatan teknologi dalam dokumentasi hukum adat. Public Service and Governance Journal, 3(1).
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2013). Putusan Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan.
Mawar, S., & Iqbal, M. (2025). Multicultural Dispute Resolution System in Aceh Before and After the Issuance of the Customary Institution Qanun. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 560-574. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.19767
Mazya, T. M., Ridho, K., & Irfani, A. (2024). Religious and cultural diversity in Indonesia: Dynamics of acceptance and conflict in a multidimensional perspective. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(7), 4932-4945. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i7-32
Novitasari, I. A., Gandryani, F., & Hadi, F. (2023). Legalitas hak komunal atas kelestarian hutan adat di wilayah Ibu Kota Nusantara. Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan, 16(1).
Nurdiansyah, E., Maftuh, B., & Malihah, E. (2023). Tepung tawar perdamaian: Resolusi konflik berlandaskan nilai-nilai Pancasila di Sumatera Selatan. Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial, 7(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v7i2.26352
Pradhani, S. I. (2021). Pendekatan pluralisme hukum dalam studi hukum adat: Interaksi hukum adat dengan hukum nasional dan internasional. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 81–124. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.81-124
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 7.
Setiawan, I., Wahyu, A. M., Rahman, A., & Sutrisno, A. (2024). Juridical study of customary law in the Indonesian national legal system. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(8), 1824-1831. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i8.317
Sinergilp, Z., Sahlepi, M. A., & Ismaidar. (2024). The role of traditional institutions in resolving Bali's customary criminal law using a restorative justice approach. International Journal of Synergy in Law, Criminal, and Justice, 1(1).
Sukriono, D., Sudirman, S., Rapita, D. D., Al Atok, A. R., & Bramantya, A. (2025). Local wisdom as legal dispute settlement: how Indonesia’s communities acknowledge Alternative Dispute Resolution?. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 261-285. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.39958
Supriansa, Rahman, S., Abbas, I., & Djanggih, H. (2024). The essence of restorative justice in the development of Indonesian law. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(8), e05780. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-025
Supriyanto, A., Santiago, F., & Barthos, M. (2023). Implementation of restorative justice as a justice law enforcement in Indonesia. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 4(5), 448–456.
Suwoko, S. (2022). Multiculturalism & democracy education in political and cultural based conflict resolution process in East Kalimantan. Iseedu: Journal of Islamic Educational Thoughts and Practices, 6(1), 28-38. DOI: 10.23917/iseedu.v6i1.20535
Syafei, E. S., Habuddin, I., Asrizal, A., & Saputra, M. (2023, December). Mediation in Social Conflict Resolution at Tanjungpinang Malay Customary Institution, Riau Islands. In Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan (Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 198-214). https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i2.1361
Ternando. (2023). Implementasi hukum adat sebagai penanganan restorative justice dalam membangun sistem alternative penyelesaian hukum pidana di Indonesia. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum.
Tirtosudarmo, R. (2022). Managing Multicultural Society in Indonesia: with Jakarta as a Show Case. Islam Nusantara: Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture, 3(2), 21-38. https://journal.unusia.ac.id/ISLAMNUSANTARA/article/view/311
Warman, A. B., Alfiander, D., Fadhli, A., & Nabilah, W. (2023). From Communal to Individual: Shifting Authorities of Family Dispute Resolution in Minangkabau Society. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 23(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v23i2.161-184
Yasri, B., Lubis, A. R., Firmansyah, V., Gianto, G., Waras, N. G. T., & Aulia, K. N. (2024). Conflict Resolution Strategies in Kampung Naga Indigenous Community: Preserving Tradition in the Face of Modernity. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 13(3), 663-671. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v13i3.84817
