Cultural and Heritage Protection in Customary Law: A Sustainability Perspective in the Global Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/zf4khx89Keywords:
Customary law, Cultural heritage, Cultural protection, Legal pluralism, SustainabilityAbstract
Globalization has had a significant impact on the sustainability of local culture and traditional heritage in Indonesia. The currents of cultural homogenization and the commodification of traditions often threaten values preserved through customary law. This study aims to analyze the mechanisms for protecting culture and heritage through customary law within a sustainability framework, and to formulate a model for integrating customary law with formal law. The study uses a qualitative approach with literature study methods and normative-empirical analysis. Data were obtained from national and international regulations, scientific journal articles, and empirical case studies such as the practice of subak in Bali and sasi in Maluku. The results show that customary law contains effective internal mechanisms for preserving culture and the environment through collective regulation, rituals, and social sanctions. However, its effectiveness is often hampered by conflicting norms, limited legitimacy in the formal legal system, and globalization pressures that encourage cultural commodification. The discussion emphasizes the importance of an adaptive integration model, including hybridization of regional regulations, co-management mechanisms, dual legal forums, cultural impact assessments, and strengthening the capacity of customary institutions. In conclusion, customary law remains relevant as an instrument for protecting culture and heritage in the global era, but it requires formal legal support to function optimally. Adaptive integration between custom and the state is key to maintaining cultural sustainability while strengthening local identity.
Downloads
References
1. Adhuri, D. S. (2015). Adat in modern Indonesia: Political identity and the struggle for recognition. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 16(4), 404–420.
2. Ali, F. (2020). Globalization and the commodification of local cultures in Southeast Asia. Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(2), 55–68.
3. Arizona, Y., & Cahyadi, ER (2019). The recognition of adat communities in Indonesia: Conflicts between adat law and state law. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 467–484.
4. Bedner, A. (2019). Indonesian customary law in the national legal system: Marginal but significant. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 20(2), 1–15.
5. Benda-Beckmann, F., & Benda-Beckmann, K. (2019). Political and legal transformations of customary law in Indonesia. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(3), 247–264.
6. Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian law and society in transition: Pluralism and reform. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 13(1), 97–123.
7. Darisera, S.I., Letedara, R., Latue, P.C., & Rakuasa, H. (2024). Reconstruction of customary law (adat law) in environmental law enforcement in Indonesia: A literature study from global and local perspectives. Rechtsvinding, 2(1), 33–38.https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding.v2i1.411
8. Davidson, J. S., & Henley, D. (2017). The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of adat from colonialism to indigenousism. Asian Studies Review, 41(3), 463–479.
9. Fisher, R., & Tsing, A. L. (2019). Adat and the environment: Local ecological knowledge in Indonesia. Human Ecology, 47(2), 151–163.
10. Hamida, N.A. (2022). Adat law and legal pluralism in Indonesia: Toward a new perspective? Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 3(1), 1–24.https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v3i1.26752
11. Harwell, E. (2020). Customary law, conservation, and conflict: Adat as a basis for environmental protection in Indonesia. World Development, 135, 105–120.
12. Hirtz, F. (2019). It's the culture, stupid! Reflections on legal pluralism and cultural heritage. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 51(2), 189–205.
13. Irawati, D. (2024). Communal land tenure and cultural resilience in Minangkabau customary law. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 55(2), 215–232.
14. Kurniawan, A., & Astuti, Y. (2021). Customary law and marine resource management: The revival of sasi in Maluku. Maritime Studies, 20(3), 287–303.
15. Kusumawati, R., & McCarthy, J.F. (2020). Reworking customary institutions for marine conservation: Adat, sasi, and resource governance in eastern Indonesia. Marine Policy, 117, 103892.
16. Manse, M. (2024). The plural legacies of legal pluralism: Local practices and colonial interpretations in Central Java and West Sumatra. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 55(1), 88–107.https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2024.2377447
17. McCarthy, J. F., & Warren, C. (2019). Communities, customary law, and resource management: The politics of customary recognition in Indonesia. Society & Natural Resources, 32(6), 641–659.
18. Moniaga, S. (2020). Legal pluralism and indigenous rights in contemporary Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 48(140), 255–273.
19. Myers, R., Intarini, DY, Sirait, MT, & Maryudi, A. (2017). Claiming the forest: Inclusions and exclusions under Indonesia's “recognition” of customary forests. Society & Natural Resources, 30(9), 1204–1219.
20. Ramstedt, M. (2025). Towards an epistemological decolonization of legal pluralism. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 15(2), 213–230. https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/2157
21. Roth, D. (2014). Environmental sustainability and legal plurality in irrigation: The case of subak in Bali. Agricultural Systems, 127, 114–121.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.01.010
22. Roth, D., & Moniaga, S. (2021). Interview with Sandrayati Moniaga: Legal pluralism and the struggle for recognition of customary rights in Indonesia. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 53(3), 485–497.https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.2017641
23. Sari, DP, & Supriyadi, D. (2022). Customary law as a tool for protecting intangible cultural heritage in Indonesia. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(4), 475–490.
24. Simonetti, M. (2023). Adat in Indonesian law and society: A tool to build resilience and overcome diversity through cultural and legal pluralism. SOAS Law Journal, 10(1), 23–39.
25. Steinhauer, J. (2020). Heritage and law: The protection of cultural heritage through customary law. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(6), 547–563.
26. Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Legal pluralism in theory and practice: Indonesia as a case study. Law & Society Review, 55(3), 623–648.
27. Main, Y. (2021). Between customary law and living law: Symbolic recognition and practical challenges. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 53(3), 251–268.https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1945222
28. Vel, J. A. C., & Bedner, A. (2021). Decentralization and adat revivalism in Indonesia: The rise of local lawmaking. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 22(5), 445–462.
29. Warren, C. (2019). Adat and the environment: Local knowledge and global governance. Journal of Political Ecology, 26(1), 87–105.
30. Zerner, C. (1994). Through a green lens: The construction of customary environmental law and community in Indonesia's Maluku Islands. Law & Society Review, 28(5), 1079–1122.
