Carbon Footprint of Indonesia’s Tropical Forests: Between Conservation, Commodity, and Climate Crisis

Authors

  • Luisa M. Manek Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/qxbf5a84

Keywords:

carbon governance, climate crisis, commodity expansion, conservation policy, tropical forests

Abstract

Indonesia’s tropical forests play a central role in the global climate system because they act as significant carbon sinks while also possessing the potential to become major sources of emissions under deforestation pressure. This study examines the complex relationship between conservation policy, commodity-driven land expansion, and the climate crisis in shaping the carbon footprint of Indonesia’s forests. A qualitative systematic review approach was used to synthesize academic publications from the last decade, focusing on forest carbon dynamics, governance mechanisms, and environmental policy. Findings show that conservation strategies grounded in ecosystem services, community participation, and integrated terrestrial and coastal management offer long-term mitigation potential, whereas commodity-based economic growth models intensify carbon emissions and undermine climate pledges. The study demonstrates that technological solutions alone cannot substitute structural governance reforms, especially when land tenure and benefit-sharing remain unclear. The conclusion emphasizes that climate resilience and sustainable carbon sequestration can be realized only when forest conservation is embedded into national development models that reduce reliance on extractive industries and ensure equitable socio-institutional participation. The research contributes novelty by integrating conservation, commodity, and climate governance dimensions to evaluate whether Indonesia’s tropical forests will remain net carbon sinks or shift into permanent carbon sources

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, B. A., & Dadi, D. (2023). Tropical forest conservation efforts as climate change mitigation in Indonesia: A review. Interdisciplinary International Journal of Conservation and Culture, 1(2), 80–89.

Alisjahbana, A. S., & Busch, J. M. (2017). Forestry, forest fires, and climate change in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53(2), 111–136.

Becker, A., Ng, A. K., McEvoy, D., & Mullett, J. (2018). Implications of climate change for shipping: Ports and supply chains. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(2), e508.

Cetera, K. (2022). Recognition of forest carbon rights in Indonesia: A constitutional approach. Lentera Hukum, 9, 151.

Fleischman, F., Basant, S., Chhatre, A., Coleman, E. A., Fischer, H. W., Gupta, D., ... & Veldman, J. W. (2020). Pitfalls of tree planting show why we need people-centered natural climate solutions. BioScience, 70(11), 947–950.

Forte, D. L. (2025). Climate crisis and animal exploitation. In Framing Sustainability in Language and Communication (p. 72).

Groom, B., Palmer, C., & Sileci, L. (2022). Carbon emissions reductions from Indonesia’s moratorium on forest concessions are cost-effective yet contribute little to Paris pledges. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(5), e2102613119.

Henders, S., Ostwald, M., Verendel, V., & Ibisch, P. (2018). Do national strategies under the UN biodiversity and climate conventions address agricultural commodity consumption as deforestation driver? Land Use Policy, 70, 580–590.

Hilmi, N., Chami, R., Sutherland, M. D., Hall-Spencer, J. M., Lebleu, L., Benitez, M. B., & Levin, L. A. (2021). The role of blue carbon in climate change mitigation and carbon stock conservation. Frontiers in Climate, 3, 710546.

Hoang, N. T., & Kanemoto, K. (2021). Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(6), 845–853.

Howson, P. (2019). Tackling climate change with blockchain. Nature Climate Change, 9(9), 644–645.

Miles, W. B. (2021). The invisible commodity: Local experiences with forest carbon offsetting in Indonesia. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(2), 499–524.

Mitter, H., Larcher, M., Schönhart, M., Stöttinger, M., & Schmid, E. (2019). Exploring farmers’ climate change perceptions and adaptation intentions: Empirical evidence from Austria. Environmental Management, 63(6), 804–821.

Moranta, J., Torres, C., Murray, I., Hidalgo, M., Hinz, H., & Gouraguine, A. (2022). Transcending capitalism growth strategies for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 36(2), e13821.

Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., Nurfatriani, F., Indrajaya, Y., Yuwati, T. W., Ekawati, S., Salminah, M., ... & Baral, H. (2022). Mainstreaming ecosystem services from Indonesia’s remaining forests. Sustainability, 14(19), 12124.

Rahmaditio, M. R. (2023). Disentangling the interlinkages between humans, biodiversity loss, and climate change in the tropical region. In Asia Conference on Environment and Sustainable Development (pp. 167–180). Springer Nature Singapore.

Sasaki, N., Asner, G. P., Pan, Y., Knorr, W., Durst, P. B., Ma, H. O., ... & Putz, F. E. (2016). Sustainable management of tropical forests can reduce carbon emissions and stabilize timber production. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 4, 50.

Sonter, L. J., Dade, M. C., Watson, J. E., & Valenta, R. K. (2020). Renewable energy production will exacerbate mining threats to biodiversity. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4174.

Vettese, T., & Pendergrass, D. (2024). Half-earth socialism: A plan to save the future from extinction, climate change and pandemics. Verso Books.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Carbon Footprint of Indonesia’s Tropical Forests: Between Conservation, Commodity, and Climate Crisis. (2025). Journal of Horizon, 2(2), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.62872/qxbf5a84