Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Balancing Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62872/dykhs649Keywords:
artificial intelligence in education, ethical challenges, educational equity, algorithmic bias, data privacyAbstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into educational systems has transformed teaching and learning practices, offering opportunities for personalization, efficiency, and data-driven decision-making. However, the widespread adoption of AI also raises significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding equity, fairness, and governance. This study aims to examine the ethical challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence in education, with a specific focus on balancing technological innovation and educational equity. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, the research is based on a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed journal articles, policy documents, and reports published by international organizations such as UNESCO, OECD, and the World Bank. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify recurring themes related to access inequality, algorithmic bias, data privacy, transparency, human agency, and institutional governance. The findings indicate that while AI has the potential to enhance learning outcomes, its implementation often exacerbates existing educational inequalities due to uneven access, biased algorithms, weak data governance, and limited institutional accountability. The study concludes that ethical considerations must be integrated into AI design, implementation, and governance to ensure that innovation in education is inclusive, transparent, and socially responsible.
Downloads
References
Adamson, F., & Morris, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence and global inequality in education: A critical perspective. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 21(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2098219
Ahmed, F. (2024). The digital divide and AI in education: Addressing equity and accessibility. AI EDIFY Journal, 1(2), 12-23.
Boateng, O., & Boateng, B. (2025). Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(1), 2012-2017.
Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Holloway, C., Cukurova, M., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence alone will not democratise education: On educational inequality, techno-solutionism and inclusive tools. Sustainability, 16(2), 781.
Cochran-Smith, M., Craig, C. J., Orland-Barak, L., Cole, C., & Hill-Jackson, V. (2022). Agents, agency, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(5), 445-448.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58498-4
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24308.76165
Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & du Boulay, B. (2022). AI in education: Ethical implications and future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13155
Mensah, G. B. (2023). Artificial intelligence and ethics: a comprehensive review of bias mitigation, transparency, and accountability in AI Systems. Preprint, November, 10(1), 1.
OECD. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3c2b8f03-en
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development.
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2014). Student data privacy and institutional accountability in an age of surveillance. In Using data to improve higher education: Research, policy and practice (pp. 197-214). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Rahman, H. T., Saint Ville, A. S., Song, A. M., Po, J. Y., Berthet, E., Brammer, J. R., ... & Hickey, G. M. (2017). A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural resource governance. International Journal of the Commons, 11(2).
Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350149430
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2019). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218815808
Song, P., & Wang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of worldwide educational artificial intelligence research development in recent twenty years. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 473-486.
Tiffin, N., George, A., & LeFevre, A. E. (2019). How to use relevant data for maximal benefit with minimal risk: digital health data governance to protect vulnerable populations in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 4(2), e001395.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance on generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/UNESCO.2023.1
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
World Bank. (2022). Digital technologies in education: Opportunities and risks. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1788-7
Zajko, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence, algorithms, and social inequality: Sociological contributions to contemporary debates. Sociology Compass, 16(3), e12962.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jihan Jihan, Najla Abdul Ilah Badjeber (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
